Compendium of Theology

 TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE

 CONTENTS

 CHAPTER 1

 CHAPTER 2

 CHAPTER 3

 CHAPTER 4

 CHAPTER 5

 CHAPTER 6

 CHAPTER 7

 CHAPTER 8

 CHAPTER 9

 CHAPTER 10

 CHAPTER 11

 CHAPTER 12

 CHAPTER 13

 CHAPTER 14

 CHAPTER 15

 CHAPTER 16

 CHAPTER 17

 CHAPTER 18

 CHAPTER 19

 CHAPTER 20

 CHAPTER 21

 CHAPTER 22

 CHAPTER 23

 CHAPTER 24

 CHAPTER 25

 CHAPTER 26

 CHAPTER 27

 CHAPTER 28

 CHAPTER 29

 CHAPTER 30

 CHAPTER 31

 CHAPTER 32

 CHAPTER 33

 CHAPTER 34

 CHAPTER 35

 CHAPTER 36

 CHAPTER 37

 CHAPTER 38

 CHAPTER 39

 CHAPTER 40

 CHAPTER 41

 CHAPTER 42

 CHAPTER 43

 CHAPTER 44

 CHAPTER 45

 CHAPTER 46

 CHAPTER 47

 CHAPTER 48

 CHAPTER 49

 CHAPTER 50

 CHAPTER 51

 CHAPTER 52

 CHAPTER 53

 CHAPTER 54

 CHAPTER 55

 CHAPTER 56

 CHAPTER 57

 CHAPTER 58

 CHAPTER 59

 CHAPTER 60

 CHAPTER 61

 CHAPTER 62

 CHAPTER 63

 CHAPTER 64

 CHAPTER 65

 CHAPTER 66

 CHAPTER 67

 CHAPTER 68

 CHAPTER 69

 CHAPTER 70

 CHAPTER 71

 CHAPTER 72

 CHAPTER 73

 CHAPTER 74

 CHAPTER 75

 CHAPTER 76

 CHAPTER 77

 CHAPTER 78

 CHAPTER 79

 CHAPTER 80

 CHAPTER 81

 CHAPTER 82

 CHAPTER 83

 CHAPTER 84

 CHAPTER 85

 CHAPTER 86

 CHAPTER 87

 CHAPTER 88

 CHAPTER 89

 CHAPTER 90

 CHAPTER 91

 CHAPTER 92

 CHAPTER 93

 CHAPTER 94

 CHAPTER 95

 CHAPTER 96

 CHAPTER 97

 CHAPTER 98

 CHAPTER 99

 CHAPTER 100

 CHAPTER 101

 CHAPTER 102

 CHAPTER 103

 CHAPTER 104

 CHAPTER 105

 CHAPTER 106

 CHAPTER 107

 CHAPTER 108

 CHAPTER 109

 CHAPTER 110

 CHAPTER 111

 CHAPTER 112

 CHAPTER 113

 CHAPTER 114

 CHAPTER 115

 CHAPTER 116

 CHAPTER 117

 CHAPTER 118

 CHAPTER 119

 CHAPTER 120

 CHAPTER 121

 CHAPTER 122

 CHAPTER 123

 CHAPTER 124

 CHAPTER 125

 CHAPTER 126

 CHAPTER 127

 CHAPTER 128

 CHAPTER 129

 CHAPTER 130

 CHAPTER 131

 CHAPTER 132

 CHAPTER 133

 CHAPTER 134

 CHAPTER 135

 CHAPTER 136

 CHAPTER 137

 CHAPTER 138

 CHAPTER 139

 CHAPTER 140

 CHAPTER 141

 CHAPTER 142

 CHAPTER 143

 CHAPTER 144

 CHAPTER 145

 CHAPTER 146

 CHAPTER 147

 CHAPTER 148

 CHAPTER 149

 CHAPTER 150

 CHAPTER 151

 CHAPTER 152

 CHAPTER 153

 CHAPTER 154

 CHAPTER 155

 CHAPTER 156

 CHAPTER 157

 CHAPTER 158

 CHAPTER 159

 CHAPTER 160

 CHAPTER 161

 CHAPTER 162

 CHAPTER 163

 CHAPTER 164

 CHAPTER 165

 CHAPTER 166

 CHAPTER 167

 CHAPTER 168

 CHAPTER 169

 CHAPTER 170

 CHAPTER 171

 CHAPTER 172

 CHAPTER 173

 CHAPTER 174

 CHAPTER 175

 CHAPTER 176

 CHAPTER 177

 CHAPTER 178

 CHAPTER 179

 CHAPTER 180

 CHAPTER 181

 CHAPTER 182

 CHAPTER 183

 CHAPTER 184

 CHAPTER 185

 CHAPTER 186

 CHAPTER 187

 CHAPTER 188

 CHAPTER 189

 CHAPTER 190

 CHAPTER 191

 CHAPTER 192

 CHAPTER 193

 CHAPTER 194

 CHAPTER 195

 CHAPTER 196

 CHAPTER 197

 CHAPTER 198

 CHAPTER 199

 CHAPTER 200

 CHAPTER 201

 CHAPTER 202

 CHAPTER 203

 CHAPTER 204

 CHAPTER 205

 CHAPTER 206

 CHAPTER 207

 CHAPTER 208

 CHAPTER 209

 CHAPTER 210

 CHAPTER 211

 CHAPTER 212

 CHAPTER 213

 CHAPTER 214

 CHAPTER 215

 CHAPTER 216

 CHAPTER 217

 CHAPTER 218

 CHAPTER 219

 CHAPTER 220

 CHAPTER 221

 CHAPTER 222

 CHAPTER 223

 CHAPTER 224

 CHAPTER 225

 CHAPTER 226

 CHAPTER 227

 CHAPTER 228

 CHAPTER 229

 CHAPTER 230

 CHAPTER 231

 CHAPTER 232

 CHAPTER 233

 CHAPTER 234

 CHAPTER 235

 CHAPTER 236

 CHAPTER 237

 CHAPTER 238

 CHAPTER 239

 CHAPTER 240

 CHAPTER 241

 CHAPTER 242

 CHAPTER 243

 CHAPTER 244

 CHAPTER 245

 CHAPTER 246

 Part Two

 CHAPTER 1

 CHAPTER 2

 CHAPTER 3

 CHAPTER 4

 CHAPTER 5

 CHAPTER 6

 CHAPTER 7

 CHAPTER 8

 CHAPTER 9

 CHAPTER 10

 BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER 92

REFUTATION OF THE PRECEDING OBJECTIONS

To set aside such quibbles, we should reflect that, in material things, one species surpasses another in perfection, in the way that, in numbers, species are diversified by adding one to another. Whatever perfection is found in lifeless bodies, plants also possess, and more besides. Again, whatever plants have, animals have too, and something else in addition. And thus we proceed until we come to man, the most perfect of bodily creatures. All that is imperfect is related as matter to what is more perfect. This is clear in the various classes of beings.

             The elements constitute the matter of bodies that are composed of similar parts; and again, bodies having similar parts are matter with respect to animals. And this is likewise to be observed in one and the same being. Among natural things, that which is endowed with a higher degree of perfection has, in virtue of its form, whatever perfection is found in lower nature, and in virtue of the same form has, besides, its own added perfection. Through its soul, the plant is a substance, and is corporeal, and besides is an animated body. Through its soul, an animal has all these perfections, and moreover is sentient. In addition to all this, man is intelligent through his soul. Thus, in any object, if we consider what pertains to the perfection of a lower grade of being, this will be material when compared with what pertains to the perfection of a higher grade. For example, if we observe that an animal has the life of a plant, this life is in some fashion material with respect to what pertains to sensitive life, which is characteristic of an animal.

             Genus, of course, is not matter, for then it would not be predicated of the whole. But it is something derived from matter; for the designation attaching to a thing in terms of what is material in it, is its genus. Specific difference is derived from the form of a thing in the same way. This is the reason why living or animated body is the genus of animal, and sensitive is the specific difference that constitutes it. Similarly, animal is the genus of man, and rational is the difference that constitutes him. Therefore, since the form of a higher grade of being comprises within itself all the perfections of a lower grade, there is not, in reality, one form from which genus is derived, and another from which specific difference is derived. Rather, genus is derived from a form so far as it has a perfection of lower degree, and specific difference is derived from the same form so far as it has a perfection of higher degree.

             Thus, although animal is the genus of man and rational is the specific difference constituting him, there need not be in man a sensitive soul distinct from the intellectual soul, as was urged in the first argument.

             This indicates the solution of the second difficulty. As we have pointed out, the form of a higher species comprises within itself all the perfections of lower classes of being. We must note, however, that the species of a material being is higher in proportion as it is less subject to matter. And so the nobler a form is, the more it must be elevated above matter. Hence the human soul, which is the noblest of all forms of matter, attains to the highest level of elevation, where it enjoys an activity that is independent of the concurrence of corporeal matter. Yet, since the same soul includes the perfection of lower levels, it also has activities in which corporeal matter shares. However, an activity is exercised by a thing in accordance with the thing's power. Therefore the human soul must have some powers or potentialities that are principles of activities exercised through the body, and these must be actions of certain parts of the body. Such are the powers of the vegetative and sensitive parts. The soul has also certain powers that are the principles of activities exercised without the body. Such are the powers of the intellectual part, whose actions are not performed by any organs. For this reason both the possible intellect and the agent intellect are said to be separate; they have no organs as principles of their actions, such as sight and hearing have, but inhere in the soul alone, which is the form of the body. Hence we need not conclude, from the fact that the intellect is said to be separate and lacks a bodily organ, whereas neither of these is true of the senses, that the intellectual soul is distinct from the sensitive soul in man.

             This also makes it clear that we are not forced to admit an intellectual soul distinct from the sensitive soul in man on the ground that the sensitive soul is corruptible whereas the intellectual soul is incorruptible, as the third objection set out to prove. Incorruptibility pertains to the intellectual part so far as it is separate. Therefore, as powers that are separate, in the sense mentioned above, and powers that are not separate, are all rooted in the same essence of the soul, there is nothing to prevent some of the powers of the soul from lapsing when the body perishes, while others remain incorruptible.

             The points already made lead to a solution of the fourth objection. All natural movement gradually advances from imperfect to perfect. The same quality is receptive of greater and less; hence alteration, which is movement in quality, being unified and continuous in its progress from potency to act, advances from imperfect to perfect. But substantial form is not receptive of greater and less, for the substantial nature of each being exists indivisibly. Therefore natural generation does not proceed continuously through many intermediate stages from imperfect to perfect, but at each level of perfection a new generation and corruption must take place. Thus in the generation of a man the fetus first lives the life of a plant through the vegetative soul; next, when this form is removed by corruption it acquires, by a sort of new generation, a sensitive soul and lives the life of an animal; finally, when this soul is in turn removed by corruption, the ultimate and complete form is introduced. This is the rational soul, which comprises within itself whatever perfection was found in the previous forms.