7. A. Behold I have prayed to God. R. What then wouldst thou know? A. All these things which I have prayed for. R. Sum them up in brief. A. God and the soul, that is what I desire to know. R. Nothing more? A. Nothing whatever. R. Therefore begin to inquire. But first explain how, if God should be set forth to thee, thou wouldst be able to say, It is enough. A. I know not how He is to be so set forth to me as that I shall say, It is enough: for I believe not that I know anything in such wise as I desire to know God. R. What then are we to do? Dost thou not judge that first thou oughtest to know, what it is to know God sufficiently, so that arriving at that point, thou mayst seek no farther? A. So I judge, indeed: but how that is to be brought about, I see not. For what have I ever understood like to God, so that I could say, As I understand this, so would I fain understand God? R. Not having yet made acquaintance with God, whence hast thou come to know that thou knowest nothing like to God? A. Because if I knew anything like God, I should doubtless love it: but now I love nothing else than God and the soul, neither of which I know. R. Do you then not love your friends? A. Loving them, how can I otherwise than love the soul? R. Do you then love gnats and bugs similarly? A. The animating soul I said I loved, not animals. R. Men are then either not your friends, or you do not love them. For every man is an animal, and you say that you do not love animals. A. Men are my friends, and I love them, not in that they are animals, but in that they are men, that is, in that they are animated by rational souls, which I love even in highwaymen. For I may with good right in any man love reason, even though I rightly hate him, who uses ill that which I love. Therefore I love my friends the more, the more worthily they use their rational soul, or certainly the more earnestly they desire to use it worthily.

CAPUT II. Quid amandum.

7. A. Ecce oravi Deum. R. Quid ergo scire vis? A. Haec ipsa omnia quae oravi. R. Breviter ea collige. A. Deum et animam scire cupio. R. Nihilne plus? A. Nihil omnino. R. Ergo incipe quaerere. Sed prius explica quomodo tibi si demonstretur Deus, possis dicere, Sat est. A. Nescio quomodo mihi demonstrari debeat, ut dicam, Sat est: non enim credo me scire aliquid sic, quomodo scire Deum desidero. R. Quid ergo agimus? Nonne censes prius tibi esse sciendum, quomodo tibi Deum scire satis sit, quo cum perveneris non amplius quaeras? A. Censeo quidem; sed quo pacto fieri possit, non video. 0873 Quid enim Deo simile unquam intellexi, ut possim dicere, Quomodo hoc intelligo, sic volo intelligere Deum? R. Qui nondum Deum nosti, unde nosti nihil te nosse Deo simile? A. Quia si aliquid Deo simile scirem, sine dubio id amarem; nunc autem nihil aliud amo quam Deum et animam, quorum neutrum scio. R. Non igitur amas amicos tuos? A. Quo pacto eos possum, amans animam, non amare? R. Hoc modo ergo et pulices et cimices amas? A. Animam me amare dixi, non animalia. R. Aut homines non sunt amici tui, aut eos non amas: omnis enim homo est animal, et animalia te non amare dixisti. A. Et homines sunt, et eos amo, non eo quod animalia, sed eo quod homines sunt; id est, ex eo quod rationales animas habent, quas amo etiam in latronibus. Licet enim mihi in quovis amare rationem, cum illum jure oderim qui male utitur eo quod amo. Itaque tanto magis amo amicos meos, quanto magis bene utuntur anima rationali, vel certe quantum desiderant ea bene uti.