Tigiuanaënsem, Leonensem, Tulancingensem et Tuxtlensem dioeceses ad gra-
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale60
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale62
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale64
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale66
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale68
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale70
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale72
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale74
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale76
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale78
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale80
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale82
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale84
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale86
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale88
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale90
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale92
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale94
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale96
Congregatio pro Gentium Evangelizatione 97
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale98
Congregatio pro Gentium Evangelizatione 99
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale100
Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale94
While affirming the belief that many people involved in social communi-
cations want to do what is right,5 we must also recognize that those who work
in this field confront "special psychological pressures and ethical dilemmas" 6
which at times see commercial competitiveness compelling communicators to
lower standards. Any trend to produce programmes and products - including
animated films and video games - which in the name of entertainment exalt
violence and portray anti-social behaviour or the trivialization of human
sexuality is a perversion, all the more repulsive when these programmes
are directed at children and adolescents. How could one explain this "enter-
tainment" to the countless innocent young people who actually suffer vio-
lence, exploitation and abuse? In this regard, all would do well to reflect on
the contrast between Christ who "put his arms around [the children] laid his
hands on them and gave them his blessing" 7 and the one who "leads astray ...
these little ones" for whom "it would be better ... if a millstone were hung
round his neck".8 Again I appeal to the leaders of the media industry to
educate and encourage producers to safeguard the common good, to uphold
the truth, to protect individual human dignity and promote respect for the
needs of the family.
4. The Church herself, in the light of the message of salvation entrusted to
her, is also a teacher of humanity and welcomes the opportunity to offer
assistance to parents, educators, communicators, and young people. Her
own parish and school programmes should be in the forefront of media
education today. Above all, the Church desires to share a vision of human
dignity that is central to all worthy human communication. "Seeing with the
eyes of Christ, I can give to others much more than their outward necessities;
I can give them the look of love which they crave".9
From the Vatican, 24 January 2007, the Feast of Saint Francis de Sales.
BENEDICTUS PP. XVI
5 Cfr Pontifical Council for Social Communications, Ethics in communications, 4. 6 Aetatis novae, 19. 7 Mk 10:16. 8 Lk 17:2. 9 Deus caritas est, 18.