S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE GRATIA CHRISTI ET DE PECCATO ORIGINALI CONTRA PELAGIUM ET COELESTIUM Libri duo .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 4. Nam cum tria constituat atque distinguat, quibus divina mandata dicit impleri, possibilitatem, 0362 voluntatem, actionem possibilitatem scilicet,

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 8. Hanc autem naturalem possibilitatem quod adjuvari Dei gratia confitetur, non est hic apertum vel quam dicat gratiam, vel quatenus ea naturam sentia

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 CAPUT XVIII.

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 CAPUT XXII.

 24. Sed ne forte respondeat, ita se hic dixisse, «Dei faciendo voluntatem, divinam mereamur gratiam,» sicut fidelibus et pie viventibus additur gratia

 CAPUT XXIII.

 CAPUT XXIV.

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 32. Nam ut de Coelestii opusculis interim taceam, vel libellis ejus, quos judiciis ecclesiasticis allegavit , quae vobis omnia, cum aliis quas necessa

 CAPUT XXXI.

 34. Deinde quamlibet sentiat gratiam, ipsis Christianis secundum merita dari dicit: cum eos qui hoc dicunt, jam in Palaestina, sicut supra commemoravi

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 41. Item in eodem opere alio loco: «Quod si etiam sine Deo,» inquit, «homines ostendunt, quales a Deo facti sunt vide quid Christiani facere possint,

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 CAPUT XLI.

 CAPUT XLII.

 CAPUT XLIII.

 CAPUT XLIV.

 CAPUT XLV.

 50. Item in eodem libro idem sanctus Ambrosius: «Nam si Petrus,» inquit (Lib. 10, n. 91, ad Luc. XXII), «lapsus est, qui dixit, Etsi alii scandalizati

 CAPUT XLVI.

 CAPUT XLVII.

 CAPUT XLVIII.

 CAPUT XLIX.

 CAPUT L.

 LIBER SECUNDUS. DE PECCATO ORIGINALI.

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 CAPUT IV.

 4. Nempe cernitis sic Coelestium concessisse parvulis Baptismum, ut in eos transire primi hominis peccatum, quod lavacro regenerationis abluitur, nolu

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 7. Sed multum misericors memoratae Sedis antistes, ubi eum vidit ferri tanta praesumptione praecipitem, tanquam furentem, donec si posset fieri resipi

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 19. Quomodo autem Pelagius obrepere tentaverit ad fallendum etiam Apostolicae Sedis episcopale judicium in hac ipsa quaestione de Baptismate parvuloru

 CAPUT XVIII.

 20. Denique quomodo respondeat advertite, et videte latebras ambiguitatis falsitati praeparare refugia. offundendo caliginem veritati ita ut etiam no

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 24. Jam vero in libro Fidei suae , quem Romam cum ipsis litteris misit ad eumdem papam Innocentium, ad quem etiam epistolam scripserat, multo evidenti

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 27. Sed multum eum ista fallit opinio. Longe aliter se habent quaestiones istae, quas esse praeter fidem 0398 arbitratur, quam sunt illae in quibus sa

 CAPUT XXIV.

 29. Quamvis ergo mors regnaverit ab Adam usque ad Moysen (Rom. V, 14), quia non eam potuit vincere nec lex data per Moysen non enim data est quae pos

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 31. Haec disputantes, a gratia mediatoris justos excludere conantur antiquos, tanquam Dei et illorum hominum non fuerit mediator homo Christus Jesus

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 CAPUT XXXI.

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 45. Reatus itaque vitii ejus de quo loquimur, in regeneratorum prole carnali tamdiu manebit, donec et illic lavacro regenerationis abluatur. Regenerat

 46. Nec quisquam miretur, et dicat, «Cur hoc creat bonitas Dei, quod possideat malignitas diaboli?» Hoc enim suae creaturae seminibus ex illa bonitate

 CAPUT XLI.

 48. His tamen verbis hominis Dei, quem tanto praeconio ipse laudavit Pelagius, contradicit, et dicit, «sicut sine virtute, ita nos sine vitio procrear

31.—Christ’s Incarnation Was of Avail to the Fathers, Even Though It Had Not Yet Happened.

By disputation of this sort, they attempt to exclude the ancient saints from the grace of the Mediator, as if the man Christ Jesus were not the Mediator between God and those men; on the ground that, not having yet taken flesh of the Virgin’s womb, He was not yet man at the time when those righteous men lived. If this, however, were true, in vain would the apostle say: “By man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.”202    1 Cor. xv. 21, 22. For inasmuch as those ancient saints, according to the vain conceits of these men, found their nature self-sufficient, and required not the man Christ to be their Mediator to reconcile them to God, so neither shall they be made alive in Him, to whose body they are shown not to belong as members, according to the statement that it was on man’s account that He became man. If, however, as the Truth says through His apostles, even as all die in Adam, even so shall all be made alive in Christ; forasmuch as the resurrection of the dead comes through the one man, even as death comes through the other man; what Christian man can be bold enough to doubt that even those righteous men who pleased God in the more remote periods of the human race are destined to attain to the resurrection of eternal life, and not eternal death, because they shall be made alive in Christ? that they are made alive in Christ, because they belong to the body of Christ? that they belong to the body of Christ, because Christ is the head even to them?203    1 Cor. xi. 3. and that Christ is the head even to them, because there is but one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus? But this He could not have been to them, unless through His grace they had believed in His resurrection. And how could they have done this, if they had been ignorant that He was to come in the flesh, and if they had not by this faith lived justly and piously? Now, if the incarnation of Christ could be of no concern to them, on the ground that it had not yet come about, it must follow that Christ’s judgment can be of no concern to us, because it has not yet taken place. But if we shall stand at the right hand of Christ through our faith in His judgment, which has not yet transpired, but is to come to pass, it follows that those ancient saints are members of Christ through their faith in His resurrection, which had not in their day happened, but which was one day to come to pass.

31. Haec disputantes, a gratia mediatoris justos excludere conantur antiquos, tanquam Dei et illorum hominum non fuerit mediator homo Christus Jesus; quia nondum ex utero Virginis carne suscepta, homo nondum fuit, quando illi justi fuerunt. Quod si ita esset, nequaquam Apostolus diceret: Per hominem mors, et per hominum resurrectio mortuorum: sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur (I Cor. XV, 21, 22). Quandoquidem illi antiqui justi, secundum istorum vaniloquia, sibi sufficiente natura, nec mediatore homine Christo indiguerunt, per quem reconciliarentur Deo: nec in eo vivificabuntur, ad cujus corpus et membra, secundum id quod propter homines homo factus est, non pertinere monstrantur. Si autem, quemadmodum per Apostolos suos Veritas loquitur, sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur; quia per illum hominem mors, et per istum hominem resurrectio mortuorum: quis audeat dubitare christianus, etiam illos justos, qui recentioribus generis humani 0401 temporibus Deo placuerunt, ideo in resurrectionem vitae aeternae, non mortis aeternae esse venturos, quia in Christo vivificabuntur; ideo autem vivificari in Christo, quoniam ad corpus pertinent Christi; et ideo pertinere ad corpus Christi, quia et ipsis caput est Christus (I Cor. XI, 3); ideo et ipsis caput esse Christum, quia unus mediator est Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus? Quod eis non fuisset, nisi in ejus resurrectionem per ejus gratiam credidissent. Et hoc quomodo fieret, si eum in carne venturum esse nescissent, neque ex hac fide juste pieque vixissent? Nam si propterea illis non profuit incarnatio Christi, quia nondum facta erat; nec nobis prodest judicium Christi de vivis et mortuis, quia nondum factum est. Si autem nos per hujus nondum facti, sed futuri judicii fidem stabimus ad dexteram Christi; profecto illi per incarnationis ejus tunc nondum factae, sed futurae fidem membra sunt Christi.