S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE GRATIA CHRISTI ET DE PECCATO ORIGINALI CONTRA PELAGIUM ET COELESTIUM Libri duo .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 4. Nam cum tria constituat atque distinguat, quibus divina mandata dicit impleri, possibilitatem, 0362 voluntatem, actionem possibilitatem scilicet,

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 8. Hanc autem naturalem possibilitatem quod adjuvari Dei gratia confitetur, non est hic apertum vel quam dicat gratiam, vel quatenus ea naturam sentia

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 CAPUT XVIII.

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 CAPUT XXII.

 24. Sed ne forte respondeat, ita se hic dixisse, «Dei faciendo voluntatem, divinam mereamur gratiam,» sicut fidelibus et pie viventibus additur gratia

 CAPUT XXIII.

 CAPUT XXIV.

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 32. Nam ut de Coelestii opusculis interim taceam, vel libellis ejus, quos judiciis ecclesiasticis allegavit , quae vobis omnia, cum aliis quas necessa

 CAPUT XXXI.

 34. Deinde quamlibet sentiat gratiam, ipsis Christianis secundum merita dari dicit: cum eos qui hoc dicunt, jam in Palaestina, sicut supra commemoravi

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 41. Item in eodem opere alio loco: «Quod si etiam sine Deo,» inquit, «homines ostendunt, quales a Deo facti sunt vide quid Christiani facere possint,

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 CAPUT XLI.

 CAPUT XLII.

 CAPUT XLIII.

 CAPUT XLIV.

 CAPUT XLV.

 50. Item in eodem libro idem sanctus Ambrosius: «Nam si Petrus,» inquit (Lib. 10, n. 91, ad Luc. XXII), «lapsus est, qui dixit, Etsi alii scandalizati

 CAPUT XLVI.

 CAPUT XLVII.

 CAPUT XLVIII.

 CAPUT XLIX.

 CAPUT L.

 LIBER SECUNDUS. DE PECCATO ORIGINALI.

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 CAPUT IV.

 4. Nempe cernitis sic Coelestium concessisse parvulis Baptismum, ut in eos transire primi hominis peccatum, quod lavacro regenerationis abluitur, nolu

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 7. Sed multum misericors memoratae Sedis antistes, ubi eum vidit ferri tanta praesumptione praecipitem, tanquam furentem, donec si posset fieri resipi

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 19. Quomodo autem Pelagius obrepere tentaverit ad fallendum etiam Apostolicae Sedis episcopale judicium in hac ipsa quaestione de Baptismate parvuloru

 CAPUT XVIII.

 20. Denique quomodo respondeat advertite, et videte latebras ambiguitatis falsitati praeparare refugia. offundendo caliginem veritati ita ut etiam no

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 24. Jam vero in libro Fidei suae , quem Romam cum ipsis litteris misit ad eumdem papam Innocentium, ad quem etiam epistolam scripserat, multo evidenti

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 27. Sed multum eum ista fallit opinio. Longe aliter se habent quaestiones istae, quas esse praeter fidem 0398 arbitratur, quam sunt illae in quibus sa

 CAPUT XXIV.

 29. Quamvis ergo mors regnaverit ab Adam usque ad Moysen (Rom. V, 14), quia non eam potuit vincere nec lex data per Moysen non enim data est quae pos

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 31. Haec disputantes, a gratia mediatoris justos excludere conantur antiquos, tanquam Dei et illorum hominum non fuerit mediator homo Christus Jesus

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 CAPUT XXXI.

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 45. Reatus itaque vitii ejus de quo loquimur, in regeneratorum prole carnali tamdiu manebit, donec et illic lavacro regenerationis abluatur. Regenerat

 46. Nec quisquam miretur, et dicat, «Cur hoc creat bonitas Dei, quod possideat malignitas diaboli?» Hoc enim suae creaturae seminibus ex illa bonitate

 CAPUT XLI.

 48. His tamen verbis hominis Dei, quem tanto praeconio ipse laudavit Pelagius, contradicit, et dicit, «sicut sine virtute, ita nos sine vitio procrear

14. [XII.]—The Righteousness Which is of God, and the Righteousness Which is of the Law.

If this grace is to be called “teaching,” let it at any rate be so called in such wise that God may be believed to infuse it, along with an ineffable sweetness, more deeply and more internally, not only by their agency who plant and water from without, but likewise by His own too who ministers in secret His own increase,—in such a way, that He not only exhibits truth, but likewise imparts love. For it is thus that God teaches those who have been called according to His purpose, giving them simultaneously both to know what they ought to do, and to do what they know. Accordingly, the apostle thus speaks to the Thessalonians: “As touching love of the brethren, ye need not that I write unto you; for ye yourselves are taught of God to love one another.”30    1 Thess. iv. 9. And then, by way of proving that they had been taught of God, he subjoined: “And indeed ye do it towards all the brethren which are in all Macedonia.”31    1 Thess. iv. 10. As if the surest sign that you have been taught of God, is that you put into practice what you have been taught. Of that character are all who are called according to God’s purpose, as it is written in the prophets: “They shall be all taught of God.”32    Isa. liv. 13; Jer. xxxi. 34; John vi. 45. The man, however, who has learned what ought to be done, but does it not, has not as yet been “taught of God” according to grace, but only according to the law,—not according to the spirit, but only according to the letter. Although there are many who appear to do what the law commands, through fear of punishment, not through love of righteousness; and such righteousness as this the apostle calls “his own which is after the law,”—a thing as it were commanded, not given. When, indeed, it has been given, it is not called our own righteousness, but God’s; because it becomes our own only so that we have it from God. These are the apostle’s words: “That I may be found in Him, not having mine own righteousness which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith.”33    Phil. iii. 9. So great, then, is the difference between the law and grace, that although the law is undoubtedly of God, yet the righteousness which is “of the law” is not “of God,” but the righteousness which is consummated by grace is “of God.” The one is designated “the righteousness of the law,” because it is done through fear of the curse of the law; while the other is called “the righteousness of God,” because it is bestowed through the beneficence of His grace, so that it is not a terrible but a pleasant commandment, according to the prayer in the psalm: “Good art Thou, O Lord, therefore in Thy goodness teach me Thy righteousness;”34    Ps. cxix. 68. that is, that I may not be compelled like a slave to live under the law with fear of punishment; but rather in the freedom of love may be delighted to live with law as my companion. When the freeman keeps a commandment, he does it readily. And whosoever learns his duty in this spirit, does everything that he has learned ought to be done.

CAPUT XIII.

14. Haec gratia si doctrina dicenda est, certe sic dicatur, ut altius et interius eam Deus cum ineffabili suavitate credatur infundere, non solum per eos qui plantant et rigant extrinsecus, sed etiam per se ipsum qui incrementum suum ministrat occultus (I Cor. III, 7), ita ut non ostendat tantummodo veritatem, verum etiam impertiat charitatem. Sic enim docet Deus eos qui secundum propositum vocati sunt, simul donans et quid agant scire, et quod sciunt agere. Unde ad Thessalonicenses sic Apostolus loquitur: De charitate autem fraternitatis non opus habetis vobis scribi; nam ipsi vos a Deo didicistis ut diligatis invicem. Atque ut probaret eos a Deo didicisse, subjunxit: Etenim facitis illud in omnes fratres, in universa Macedonia (I Thess. IV, 9, 10). Tanquam hoc sit certissimum indicium quod a Deo didiceris, si id quod didiceris feceris. Isto modo sunt omnes secundum propositum vocati, sicut scriptum est in Prophetis, docibiles Dei (Isai. LIV, 13; Joan. VI, 45). Qui autem novit quidem quod fieri debeat, et non facit, nondum a Deo didicit secundum gratiam, sed secundum legem; non secundum spiritum, sed secundum litteram. Quamvis multi, quod imperat lex, facere videantur timore poenae, non amore justitiae: quam dicit Apostolus justitiam suam quae ex lege est; tanquam sit imperata, non data. Si autem data est, non dicitur justitia nostra, sed Dei: quia sic fit nostra, ut sit nobis ex Deo. Dicit enim: Ut inveniar in 0368 illo non habens meam justitiam, quae ex lege est, sed eam quae ex fide est Jesu, justitiam ex Deo (Philipp. III, 9). Tantum igitur inter legem distat et gratiam, ut cum lex esse non dubitetur ex Deo, justitia tamen quae ex lege est, non sit ex Deo; sed justitia quae per gratiam consummatur, ex Deo. Quia ex lege justitia dicitur, quae fit propter legis maledictum : justitia ex Deo dicitur, quae datur per gratiae beneficium; ut non sit terribile, sed suave mandatum, sicut oratur in Psalmo, Suavis es, Domine, et in tua suavitate doce me justitiam tuam (Psal. CXVIII, 68): id est, ut non formidine poenae serviliter cogar esse sub lege, sed libera charitate delecter esse cum lege. Praeceptum quippe liber facit, qui libens facit. Et hoc modo quisquis discit, agit omnino quidquid agendum didicerit.