S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE GRATIA CHRISTI ET DE PECCATO ORIGINALI CONTRA PELAGIUM ET COELESTIUM Libri duo .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 4. Nam cum tria constituat atque distinguat, quibus divina mandata dicit impleri, possibilitatem, 0362 voluntatem, actionem possibilitatem scilicet,

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 8. Hanc autem naturalem possibilitatem quod adjuvari Dei gratia confitetur, non est hic apertum vel quam dicat gratiam, vel quatenus ea naturam sentia

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 CAPUT XVIII.

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 CAPUT XXII.

 24. Sed ne forte respondeat, ita se hic dixisse, «Dei faciendo voluntatem, divinam mereamur gratiam,» sicut fidelibus et pie viventibus additur gratia

 CAPUT XXIII.

 CAPUT XXIV.

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 32. Nam ut de Coelestii opusculis interim taceam, vel libellis ejus, quos judiciis ecclesiasticis allegavit , quae vobis omnia, cum aliis quas necessa

 CAPUT XXXI.

 34. Deinde quamlibet sentiat gratiam, ipsis Christianis secundum merita dari dicit: cum eos qui hoc dicunt, jam in Palaestina, sicut supra commemoravi

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 41. Item in eodem opere alio loco: «Quod si etiam sine Deo,» inquit, «homines ostendunt, quales a Deo facti sunt vide quid Christiani facere possint,

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 CAPUT XLI.

 CAPUT XLII.

 CAPUT XLIII.

 CAPUT XLIV.

 CAPUT XLV.

 50. Item in eodem libro idem sanctus Ambrosius: «Nam si Petrus,» inquit (Lib. 10, n. 91, ad Luc. XXII), «lapsus est, qui dixit, Etsi alii scandalizati

 CAPUT XLVI.

 CAPUT XLVII.

 CAPUT XLVIII.

 CAPUT XLIX.

 CAPUT L.

 LIBER SECUNDUS. DE PECCATO ORIGINALI.

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 CAPUT IV.

 4. Nempe cernitis sic Coelestium concessisse parvulis Baptismum, ut in eos transire primi hominis peccatum, quod lavacro regenerationis abluitur, nolu

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 7. Sed multum misericors memoratae Sedis antistes, ubi eum vidit ferri tanta praesumptione praecipitem, tanquam furentem, donec si posset fieri resipi

 CAPUT VII.

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 19. Quomodo autem Pelagius obrepere tentaverit ad fallendum etiam Apostolicae Sedis episcopale judicium in hac ipsa quaestione de Baptismate parvuloru

 CAPUT XVIII.

 20. Denique quomodo respondeat advertite, et videte latebras ambiguitatis falsitati praeparare refugia. offundendo caliginem veritati ita ut etiam no

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 24. Jam vero in libro Fidei suae , quem Romam cum ipsis litteris misit ad eumdem papam Innocentium, ad quem etiam epistolam scripserat, multo evidenti

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 27. Sed multum eum ista fallit opinio. Longe aliter se habent quaestiones istae, quas esse praeter fidem 0398 arbitratur, quam sunt illae in quibus sa

 CAPUT XXIV.

 29. Quamvis ergo mors regnaverit ab Adam usque ad Moysen (Rom. V, 14), quia non eam potuit vincere nec lex data per Moysen non enim data est quae pos

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 31. Haec disputantes, a gratia mediatoris justos excludere conantur antiquos, tanquam Dei et illorum hominum non fuerit mediator homo Christus Jesus

 CAPUT XXVII.

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 CAPUT XXXI.

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII.

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 CAPUT XXXV.

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 45. Reatus itaque vitii ejus de quo loquimur, in regeneratorum prole carnali tamdiu manebit, donec et illic lavacro regenerationis abluatur. Regenerat

 46. Nec quisquam miretur, et dicat, «Cur hoc creat bonitas Dei, quod possideat malignitas diaboli?» Hoc enim suae creaturae seminibus ex illa bonitate

 CAPUT XLI.

 48. His tamen verbis hominis Dei, quem tanto praeconio ipse laudavit Pelagius, contradicit, et dicit, «sicut sine virtute, ita nos sine vitio procrear

46.—Difficulty of Believing Original Sin. Man’s Vice is a Beast’s Nature.

No one should feel surprise, and ask: “Why does God’s goodness create anything for the devil’s malignity to take possession of?” The truth is, God’s gift is bestowed on the seminal elements of His creature with the same bounty wherewith “He maketh His sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.”253    Matt. v. 45. It is with so large a bounty that God has blessed the very seeds, and by blessing has constituted them. Nor has this blessing been eliminated out of our excellent nature by a fault which puts us under condemnation. Owing, indeed, to God’s justice, who punishes, this fatal flaw has so far prevailed, that men are born with the fault of original sin; but yet its influence has not extended so far as to stop the birth of men. Just so does it happen in persons of adult age: whatever sins they commit, do not eliminate his manhood from man; nay, God’s work continues still good, however evil be the deeds of the impious. For although “man being placed in honour abideth not; and being without understanding, is compared with the beasts, and is like them,”254    Ps. xlix. 12. yet the resemblance is not so absolute that he becomes a beast. There is a comparison, no doubt, between the two; but it is not by reason of nature, but through vice—not vice in the beast, but in nature. For so excellent is a man in comparison with a beast, that man’s vice is beast’s nature; still man’s nature is never on this account changed into beast’s nature. God, therefore, condemns man because of the fault wherewithal his nature is disgraced, and not because of his nature, which is not destroyed in consequence of its fault. Heaven forbid that we should think beasts are obnoxious to the sentence of condemnation! It is only proper that they should be free from our misery, inasmuch as they cannot partake of our blessedness. What, then, is there surprising or unjust in man’s being subjected to an impure spirit—not on account of nature, but on account of that impurity of his which he has contracted in the stain of his birth, and which proceeds, not from the divine work, but from the will of man;—since also the impure spirit itself is a good thing considered as spirit, but evil in that it is impure? For the one is of God, and is His work, while the other emanates from man’s own will. The stronger nature, therefore, that is, the angelic one, keeps the lower, or human, nature in subjection, by reason of the association of vice with the latter. Accordingly the Mediator, who was stronger than the angels, became weak for man’s sake. 255    2 Cor. viii. 9. So that the pride of the Destroyer is destroyed by the humility of the Redeemer; and he who makes his boast over the sons of men of his angelic strength, is vanquished by the Son of God in the human weakness which He assumed.

46. Nec quisquam miretur, et dicat, «Cur hoc creat bonitas Dei, quod possideat malignitas diaboli?» Hoc enim suae creaturae seminibus ex illa bonitate largitur, qua etiam facit solem suum oriri super bonos et malos, et pluit super justes et injustos (Matth. V, 45). Hac quippe bonitate etiam ipsa semina benedixit, vel benedicendo constituit: quam benedictionem naturae laudabili culpa damnabilis non ademit. Quae licet per Dei punientis justitiam valuerit, ut homines cum peccati originalis vitio nascerentur; non tamen valuit, ut homines non nascerentur. Sicut in ipsis aetate majoribus quaelibet vitia peccatorum non ex homine hominem tollunt; sed permanet Dei opus bonum, in quantiscumque malis operibus impiorum. Nam etsi homo in honore positus, et non intelligens, comparatur pecoribus, eisque similis fit (Psal. XLVIII, 13); non tamen usque adeo similis fit, ut pecus sit. Comparatur namque per vitium, non per naturam; non pecoris vitio, sed naturae. Tantae namque excellentiae est in comparatione pecoris homo, ut vitium hominis natura sit pecoris: nec tamen ideo natura hominis in naturam vertitur pecoris. Ac per hoc Deus hominem damnat propter vitium, quo natura dehonestatur; non propter naturam, quae vitio non aufertur. Bestias vero absit ut opinemur poenae damnationis obnoxias, quas justum est ut miseriae sint expertes, quae nec beatitudinis possunt esse participes. Quid ergo mirum est vel iniquum, ut immundo spiritui subdatur homo, non propter naturam, sed propter immunditiam suam, quam non ex opere divino, sed ex humana voluntate venientem in originis labe contraxit: cum et ipse spiritus immundus, bonum sit, quod spiritus; malum, quod immundus? Illud quippe est ex Dei opere, hoc ex propria voluntate. 0409 Natura itaque fortior, id est, angelica, inferiorem naturam, id est, humanam, vitii societate subditam tenet. Ideo Mediator angelis fortior, infirmus propter homines factus est: sic superbia captivatoris, Redemptoris humilitate destruitur; ut qui super filios hominis angelica fortitudine gloriatur, a Filio Dei suscepta humana infirmitate vincatur.