Thus far our argument goes with him. But the riddle with which he accompanies his words we must leave to those trained in the wisdom of Prunicus135    This may mean “short-hand” i.e. something difficult to decipher. See Book I. vi. note 10. to interpret: for he seems to have produced what he has said from that system. “Being incorruptible without beginning, He is ungenerate without end, being so called absolutely, and independently of aught beside Himself.” Now whoever has purged ears and an enlightened understanding knows, even without my saying it, that beyond the jingle of words produced by their extraordinary combination, there is no trace of sense in what he says; and if any shadow of an idea could be found in such a din of words, it would prove to be either profane or ridiculous. For what do you mean when you say that He is without beginning as being without end, and without end as being without beginning? Do you think beginning identical with end, and that the two words are employed in the same sense, just as the appellations Simon and Peter represent one and the same subject, and on this account, in accordance with your thinking beginning and end the same, did you, combining under one signification these two words which denote privation of each other,—end, I mean, and beginning,—and taking the being without end as convertible with the being without end, blend and confound one word with the other; and is this the meaning of such a mixing up of words, when you say that He is ungenerate as being without end, and that He is without end as being ungenerate? Yet how is it that you did not see the profanity as well as the ridiculous folly of your words? For if by this novel confusion of the words they are made convertible, so that ungenerate means ungenerate without end, and that which is without end is such ungenerately, it follows by necessity that that which is without end must needs be so as being ungenerate: and thus it comes to pass, my good friend, that your much-talked-of ungeneracy, which you say is the only characteristic of the Father’s essence, will be found to be shared with whatever is immortal, and to be making all things consubstantial with the Father, because it is alike apparent in all things whose life, by reason of their immortality, goes on to infinity, archangels, that is, angels, human souls, and, it may be also, in the Apostate host, the Devil and his dæmons. For if that which is without end, and imperishable, must also by your argument be ungenerately imperishable, then in whatsoever is without end and imperishable there must be connoted ungeneracy. These are the absurdities into which those men fall who, before they have learnt what it is fitting for them to learn, only publish their own ignorance by what they attempt to teach. For if he had any faculty of discernment, he would not be ignorant of the peculiar sense inherent in his terms, “without beginning,” and “without end,” and that the term without end is common to all things whose life we believe capable of extension to infinity, while the term without beginning belongs to Him alone Who is without originating cause. How, then, is it possible for us to regard that which is common to them all, as equivalent to that which is believed by all to be a special attribute of the Deity alone, so that we thereby either extend ungeneracy to everything that shares in immortality, or else must not allow immortality to any one of them, seeing that the being without end is to belong only to the ungenerate, and vice versa, the being ungenerate is to belong only to that which is without end? Thus everything without end would have to be regarded as ungenerate.

Μέχρι τούτου καὶ ὁ ἡμέτερος ἕπεται λόγος. τὸν δὲ συγγεγραμμένον τοῖς εἰρημένοις γρῖφον ἑρμηνευόντων οἱ τῇ Προυνίκου σοφίᾳ ἐγγυμνασθέντες: ἐξ ἐκείνης γὰρ δοκεῖ μοι τῆς παρασκευῆς τὰ εἰρημένα προενηνοχέναι. τί γάρ φησιν; « ἄφθαρτος ὢν ἀνάρχως ἀγέννητός ἐστιν ἀτελευτήτως οὔτε καθ' ἕτερον οὔτε δι' ἕτερον οὔτε πρὸς ἕτερον λεγόμενος ». ὁ γὰρ κεκαθαρμένος τὴν ἀκοὴν καὶ διορατικὸς τὴν διάνοιαν οἶδε καὶ πρὸ τῶν ἐμῶν λόγων ὅτι πλὴν τοῦ πατάγου τῶν ὀνομάτων, ἃ τῇ ἀλλοκότῳ αὐτῶν συμπλοκῇ κατεκρότησεν, οὐδὲν ἴχνος ἐπιστημονικῆς διανοίας ἐν τοῖς εἰρημένοις εὑρίσκεται. εἰ δὲ ἄρα τις καὶ σκιὰ νοήματος τῷ ψόφῳ τῶν ῥημάτων ἐνευρεθείη, ἀσεβὲς τὸ εὑρεθὲν ἔσται πάντως ἢ καταγέλαστον. τί γὰρ νοῶν τοῦτο λέγεις, εἰπέ μοι, ὅτι ἄναρχός ἐστιν ἀτελευτήτως καὶ ἀτελεύτητος ἀνάρχως; ἆρα ταὐτὸν οἴει τὴν ἀρχὴν εἶναι τῷ τέλει καὶ καθ' ἑνὸς κεῖσθαι νοήματος τὰς δύο φωνάς, ὡς Πέτρου καὶ Σίμωνος αἱ προσηγορίαι ἕν τι τὸ ὑποκείμενον δι' ἑαυτῶν δηλοῦσι, καὶ τούτου χάριν ὥσπερ τὴν ἀρχὴν τῷ τέλει ταὐτὸν εἶναι νομίζεις, οὕτως συνάψας πρὸς μίαν σημασίαν τὰς δύο φωνὰς τὰς ἑκατέρου τούτων ἀναιρετικάς, τοῦ τέλους λέγω καὶ τῆς ἀρχῆς, ἐκ τοῦ ἀντιστρόφου νοήσας τῷ ἀνάρχῳ ταὐτὸν εἶναι τὸ ἀτελεύτητον μίαν τὰς δύο φωνὰς συγχέας ἐν ἀλλήλαις ἐποίησας, καὶ τοῦτό σοι βούλεται τῶν ὀνομάτων ἡ μίξις ἐν τῷ λέγειν ἀγέννητον εἶναι ἀτελευτήτως καὶ ἀτελεύτητον ἀγεννήτως; καὶ πῶς οὐκ εἶδες τὸ ἀσεβὲς ἐν τοῖς λεγομένοις ἅμα καὶ καταγέλαστον; εἰ γὰρ ἐκ τοῦ ἴσου γίνεται διὰ τῆς καινῆς ταύτης μίξεως ἡ τῶν ὀνομάτων ἀναστροφή, ὡς τὸ ἀγέννητον ἀτελευτήτως εἶναι ἀγέννητον καὶ τὸ ἀτελεύτητον ἀγεννήτως εἶναι ἀτελεύτητον, ἀνάγκη πᾶσα πᾶν ἀτελεύτητον μὴ ἄλλως εἶναι εἰ μὴ ἀγεννήτως εἴη: καὶ οὕτως εὑρίσκεταί σοι, ὦ φίλτατε, ἡ πολυθρύλητος « ἀγεννησία » ἡ μόνη κατὰ σὲ τοῦ πατρὸς τὴν οὐσίαν χαρακτηρίζουσα κοινοποιουμένη πρὸς πᾶν τὸ ἀθάνατον καὶ πάντα ποιοῦσα τῷ πατρὶ ὁμοούσια, διὰ τὸ πᾶσιν ὁμοίως ἐμφαίνεσθαι, οἷς διὰ τῆς ἀθανασίας πρόεισιν ἡ ζωὴ πρὸς τὸ ἄπειρον, ἀρχαγγέλοις ἀγγέλοις ἀνθρωπίναις ψυχαῖς, τάχα δὲ καὶ αὐτῇ τῇ ἀποστατικῇ δυνάμει, τῷ διαβόλῳ καὶ τοῖς δαίμοσιν. εἰ γὰρ τὸ ἀτελεύτητόν τε καὶ ἄφθαρτον ἀγεννήτως κατὰ τὸν σὸν λόγον πάντως ἐστί, παντὶ τῷ ἀτελευτήτῳ τε καὶ ἀφθάρτῳ συνθεωρεῖσθαι πάντως χρὴ τὸ ἀγέννητον. τούτοις περιπίπτουσιν οἱ πρὶν μαθεῖν ἃ προσήκει μαθεῖν, δι' ὧν διδάσκειν ἐπιχειροῦσι τὴν ἑαυτῶν ἀμαθίαν δημοσιεύοντες. εἰ γὰρ εἶχέ τινα διακριτικὴν ἐπιστήμην, οὐκ ἂν ἠγνόησε τὴν ἰδιαζόντως ἐγκειμένην τῷ τε ἀνάρχῳ καὶ τῷ ἀτελευτήτῳ διάνοιαν, καὶ ὅτι τὸ μὲν ἀτελεύτητον κοινὸν πάντων ἐστίν, ὅσα διαρκεῖν πεπίστευται τῇ ζωῇ πρὸς τὸ ἄπειρον, τὸ δὲ ἄναρχον μόνου ἐστὶ τοῦ ἄνευ αἰτίας ὄντος. πῶς οὖν ἐστι τὸ πάντων κοινὸν ἰσοδύναμον ἐκείνων νομίσαι, ὃ μόνου τοῦ θεοῦ κατ' ἐξαίρετον εἶναι παρὰ πάντων πεπίστευται, ὥστε διὰ τούτου ἢ κοινοποιῆσαι πρὸς πάντα τὰ τῆς ἀθανασίας μετέχοντα τὸ ἀγέννητον ἢ μηδὲν ἀθάνατον συγχωρεῖν εἶναι, εἴπερ μόνου ἐστὶ τοῦ ἀγεννήτου τὸ ἀτελευτήτως εἶναι, καὶ τὸ ἔμπαλιν εἰ τοῦ ἀτελευτήτου μόνου ἐστὶ τὸ ἀγεννήτως εἶναι. οὕτω γὰρ ἂν εἶναι νομισθείη τὰ ἀτελεύτητα πάντα ἀγέννητα.