Mutatio In Expressione.

§ 286. Hanc gothicae grammaticae partem aggredientibus nobis ampla materies datur, indolem gothorum interpretum investigandi nec non et discutiendi. Quippe qui quos limites aliae linguae in mutanda expressione communiter servant, praetergredientes, in apertum campum, non solum constructiones, sed etiam vocabula, ubi proxima sequuntur, non vocabula tantum, sed et species, formam, scriptionemque vocabulorum, ubi duplex adest, mutaturi, prodant.

1) Sic igitur quam maxime eos poenes est scriptionem commutant. Hinc praecipue duplex scribendi modus terminationem verbalem et nominalem in þ, þs, et d, ds, in au et u, in i et ei, in j et ï, etc.; hinc occurrunt: Joan. XV, 11 þata rodida ïzvis, ei faheþs meina in ïzvis sijai jah faheds ïzvara usfulljaidau; XVII, 18 svasve mik ïnsandides ïn manaseþ, svah ïk ïnsandida ïns ïn manased; et vice versa XV, 19 jabai þis fairwaus veseiþ, aiþþau so manaseds svesans frijodedi. aþþan unte us þamma fairwau ni sijuþ, duþþe fijaid ïzvis so manaseþs; XIII, 31 nu gasveraids varþ sunus mans jah guþ hauhiþs ïst; Tim. I, III, 16 saei gabairhtiþs varþ in leika, garaihts gadomiþs varþ ïn ahmin, ataugids varþ þaim aggilum, merids varþ ïn þiudom, galaubiþs varþ ïn fairwau; Luc. X, 20 ni faginoþ, ei þai ahmans ïzvis ufhausjand, ïþ faginod etc.; IX, 26 saei allis skamaiþ sik meina, þizuh sunus mans skamaid sik; III, 14 ni mannanhun holoþ, ni mannanhun anamatjaid jah valdaiþ annom ïzvaraim; I, 32, 35; Joan. XI, 25; XII, 48; XIII, 13, 35; XIV, 12, 15, 21; XV, 10; coll. Gal. III, 1, 3 unfrodans—unfroþans; Cor. II, VIII, 9 ïesus gaunledida sik gabigs visands, ei jus þamma ïs unledja gabeigai vairþaiþ; Luc. XVIII, 38 sq. ïs ufvopida qiþands · ïesus, sunu daveidis, armai mik! —ïþ ïs und filu mais hropida · sunau daveidis, armai mik! Cor. I, XII, 13 allai du ainamma leika daupidai si um, allai ainamma ahmin dragkidai sijum; IX, 20 varþ ïudaium sve judaius, ei judaiuns gagaigeidedjau.

«Annotatio 1.—Verumtamen legitur etiam Joan. XII, 47 ni qam, ei stojau manased, ak ei ganasjau manased; XI, 26 wazuh saei libaiþ jah galaubeiþ du mis, ni gadauþniþ aiv etc.»

2) Formae commutantur: Luc. I, 1, 2 managai dugunnun 1228 meljan ïnsaht bi þos gafullaveisidons ïn uns vaihtins, svasve anafulhun unsis, þaiei silbasiunjos vesun; Cor. I, XIII, 7 allata þulaiþ, allata galaubeiþ, all veneiþ, all gabeidiþ; Mc. XI, 29 sq. fraihna ïzvis ainis vaurdis jah andhafjiþ mis · daupeins ïohannis uzuh himina vas þau uzuh mannam? andhafeiþ mis? Imo etiam vocalica et consonantica formae adjectivi et participii passivi, quarum tamen quaeque ex certis tantum regulis alias occurrit, ut Rom. IX, 2 saurga mis ïst mikila jah unweilo aglo; Luc. I, 28 fagino anstai audahafta, frauja miþ þus, þiuþido þu ïn qinom; V, 31 ni þaurbun hailai leikeis ak þai unhailans; Skeir. I, a nasjands ni ïbna nih galeiks unsarai garaihtein vas; V, d ni ïbnon ak galeika sveriþa usgiban, coll. tamen de ultimis locis § 196, annot. 3.

«Annotatio 2.—Huc vero non adducendi sunt casus ut Mth. VI, 30 þata havi haiþjos himma daga visando jah gistradagis ïn auhn galagiþ guþ vasjiþ, cum participium activi, ubi neutrum est, non aliam nisi consonanticam formam induere potest, vid. § 103.»

3) Vocabula diversae declinationis, formationis et speciei: Joan. XVIII, 28 tauhun ïesu fram kajafin ïn praitoriaun (πραιτώριον), þanuh vas maurgins, ïþ eis ni ïddjedun ïn praitoria (πραιτώριον); 16, sq. qaþ dauravardai (θυρωρῷ, a dauravarda) jah attauh ïnn paitru. þaruh qaþ jaina þivi, so dauravardo (θυρωρός) etc.; Mth. X, 41 sa andnimands praufetu ïn namin praufetaus (προφήτου) mizdon praufetis (προφήτου) nimiþ; Luc. VI, 38 mitads (μέτρον) goda jah ufarfulla gibada ïn barm ïzvarana. þizai auk samon mitadjon (μέτρῳ, a mitadjo) etc.; Joan. XIX, 2, 5 gadrauhteis usvundun vippja (στέφανον, a vippja) us þaurnum.—usïddja ïesus bairands þana þaurneinan vaip (στέφανον, a vaips); Cor. II, III, 7, 13 ni mahtedun fairveitjan du vlita (πρόςωπον, a vlits) mosezis.—moses lagida hulistr ana andavleizn (πρόςωπον, ab andavleizns); Joan. XV, 6 sq. niba saei visiþ (μείνῃ)— aþþan jabai sijuþ (μείνητε, casus animadversu dignissimus, quippe cum ambobus verbis infinitivum visan commune sit, utrisque vero diverso flexis forma anomala proprie tantum copula evadit, vid. § 134, 5 et annot.); Luc. II, 12, 16 bigitid barn galagid (κείμενον, jam positum) ïn uzetin; Cor. I, XIII, 8 friaþva aiv ni gadriusiþ ïþ jaþþe praufetja gatairanda (κατηργηθήσονται), jaþþe razdos gaweiland, jaþþe kunþi gataurniþ (καταργηθήσεται); Luc. X, 9, 11 atnewida ana ïzvis þiudangardi guþs.—atnewida sik etc.; Cor. I, X, 23 all binah (ἔξεστιν), akei ni all daug. all mis binauht ïst (ἔξεστιν,) akei ni all timreiþ; Luc. VI, 36 vairþaid bleiþjandans (οἰκτίρμονες), svasve jah atta ïzvar bleiþs (οἰκτίρμων) ïst; Joan. VII, 4, 10 ni manna ïn analaugnein (ἐν κρυπτῷ), coll. § 242, annot. 1) a); Luc. XIX, 17, 19 sijais valdufni habands ufar (ἐπάνω, praepos.) taihun baurgim.—sijais ufaro (ἐπάνω, adverb.) fimf baurgim; Mth. V, 18 und þatei (ἕως ἄν) allata vairþiþ; 1229 VII, 29 vas ïesus laisjands sve (ὡς) valdufni habands jah ni svasve (ὡς) bokarjos; Mc. I, 22; coll. Mc. V, 4 ufta eisarnam bi fotuns gabuganaim (πέδαις) jah naudibandjom eisarneinaim gabundans vas jah galausida af sis þos naudibandjos jah þo ana fotum eisarna (πέδας) gabrak; Luc. VII, 41 simul leguntur dulgis skula (debitor) et dulgahaitja (creditor.).

4) a) Composita et simplicia promiscue usurpantur: Joan. XVII, 25 manaseþs þuk ni ufkunþa (ἔγνω) ïþ ïk þuk kunþa (ἔγνων) jah þai ufkunþedun (ἔγνωσαν), þatei þu mik ïnsandides; IX, 31 vitum, þatei guþ fravaurhtaim ni andhauseiþ (ἀκούει), ak jabai was guþblostreis ïst, þamma hauseiþ (ἀκούει); XIX, 6; Rom. XV, 4; Cor. I, XV, 48 sq.; Luc. X, 24 managai vildedum saiwan, þatei jus saiwiþ, jah ni gasewun, jah hausjan, þatei gahausideduþ, jah ni hausidedun; Joan. IX, 7 qaþ du þamma blindin· gagg þvahan (νίψαι) ïn svumsl siloamis, galaiþ jah afþvoh (ἐνίψατο); Mth. V, 23 sq., 27 sq.; Mc. III, 24 sqq.; Luc. XIV, 11; XIX, 24 et 26; Cor. I, IV, 7.

«Annotatio 3.—Adest tamen apud Mth. V, 17, 19 gatairan pro λύειν et καταλύειν etc.»

b) Diversa eomposita inter se mutantur: pro ἀπογράφεσθαι Luc. II, 1, 3, 5 gameljan—meljan—anameljan; pro εὐφραίνεσθαι Luc. XV, 23, 24, 29, 32 vaila visan—visan—bivisan—vaila visan; pro παρεστάναι Mc. XIV, 69 sq. faurastandan et atstandan; pro ἀφιέναι Luc. VII, 47 fraletan et afletan.

5) Synonyma vocabula commutantur, nempe:

a) Nomina: Joan. IX, 22 sq. þata qeþun þai fadrein (γονεῖς) ïs—duh þe þai berusjos (γονεῖς) ïs qeþun; Luc. IX, 60 let þans dauþans (νεκρούς) usfilhan seinans navins (νεκρούς); XVII, 33 saei sokeiþ saivala seina ganasjan, fraqisteiþ ïzai (αὐτήν), jah saei fraqisteiþ ïzai ïn meina, ganasjiþ þo (αὐτήν); X, 26 þaruh (ὁ δέ) qaþ du ïmma · ïn vitoda wa gameliþ ïst? ïþ ïs (ὁ δὲ) andhafjands qaþ etc.; Mc. IX, 37 saei (ὣς ἔαν) ain þize svaleikaize barne andnimiþ ana namin meinamma, mik andnimiþ, jah sawazuh saei (ὃς ἔαν) etc.; X, 43 sq. sawazuh saei vili vairþan mikils ïn ïzvis, sijai ïzvar andbahts, jah saei vili etc.; Mth. V, 32 wazuh saei—sa ïze; Joan. VI, 64 vissa ïesus, warjai sind þai ni galaubjandans (τίνες εἰσὶν οἱ μὴ πιστεύοντες) jah was ïst saei galeiveiþ (τίς ἐστὶν ὁ παραδώσων) ïna; Eph. I, 18 ei viteiþ, wa (τίς) ïst vens laþonais ïs, wileika (τίς) gabei vulþaus arbjis ïs. Coll. § 203, annot. 2.

«Annotatio 4.—Mth. IX, 32 sq. atberun ïmma mannan baudana daimonari, jah biþe usdribans varþ unhulþo, rodida sa dumba, quamvis Graecus bis κωφόν habeat, bauds tamen hic de muto intelligi nequit, sed probabiliter Gothus cum pluribus versionibus surdum vel mutum et surdum in suo codice legit.»

b) Verba: Mth. VI, 2, 5 andnemun (receperunt, ἀπέχουσι) mizdon seina.—haband iz (habent, ἀπέχουσι) mizdon seina; Luc. XIX, 31, 34 frauja þis gairneiþ (χρείαν ἔχει).— fraujin þaurfts þis 1230 ïst (χρείαν ἔχει); Joan. VII, 28 mik kunnuþ (οἴδατε) jah viteiþ (οἴδατε), waþro ïm; IX, 29; XVI, 27 sq. galaubideduþ, þatei ïk fram guþa urrann (ἔξηλθον). uzuhïddja (ἐξῆλθον) fram attin; Rom. X, 13 sq. wazuh saei anahaitiþ bidai (ἐπικαλέσηται) namo fraujins, ganisiþ. waiva nu bidjand (ἐπικαλέσονται), þammei ni galaubjand? XI, 22 sq. ana þus silbin, jabai þairhvisis (ἐπιμείνῃς), aþþan (? aiþþau) jah þu usmaitaza. jah jainai niba gatulgjand sik (ἐπιμείνωσι), ïn ungalaubeinai ïntrusgjanda; Cor. I, XV, 5 sq. xristus ataugids ïst (ὤφθη) kefin, þaþroh þan gasaiwans ïst (ὤφθη) managizam þan fifhundam þaþroh þan ataugida sik (ὤφθη) ïakobau; 50 leik jah bloþ þiudinassu guþs ganiman (κληρονομῆσα) ni magun nih riurei unriureins arbjo vairþiþ (κληρονομεῖ); II, VII, 9 fagino, ni unte gauridai vesuþ (ἐλυπήθητε), ak unte gauridai vesuþ du ïdreigai, saurgaideduþ (ἐλυπήθητε) auk bi guþ etc.; Mth. XXVI, 70, 72, 75 paitrus laugnida (ἠρνήσατο) — jah aftra laugnida (ἠρνήσατο)— faur hanins hruk þrim sinþam afaikis (ἀπαρνήσῃ) mik; pro ista codicis ambrosiani lectione codex argentens in utroque loco (deficit enim prius) legit afaiaik—afaikis; Luc. V, 27, 28 laistei afar mis (ἀκολούθει μοι)— ïddja afar ïmma (ἠκολούθησεν αὐτῷ), ubi de ïddja in margine laistida glossatur.

c) Particulae: Luc. IX, 51, 53 gatulgida gaggan ïn (εἰς) ïairusalem.—andvairþi ïs vas gaggando du (εἰς) ïairusalem; Cor. II, IX, 13 mikiljan guþ ana ufhauseinai (ἐπὶ τῇ ὑποταγῇ) andahaitis ïn aivaggeljon jah ïn ainfalþein (ἁπλότητι) etc.; Skeir. VII, c ni ana þaim hlaibam ainaim mahtais filusna ustaiknida ak jah ïn þaim fiskam; Mc. IV, 21 ïbai lukarn qimiþ, duþe ei uf (ὑπό) melan satjaidau aiþþau undar (ὑπό) ligr? Joan. VII, 22 moses atgaf ïzvis bimait, ni þatei fram (ἐκ) mose sijai, ak us (ἐκ) attam; Mc. IX, 19 sq. bairiþ ïna du (πρός) mis. jah brahtedun ïna at (πρός) ïmma; Luc. XV, 29 sva filu jere skalkinoda þus jah ni wanhun (οὐδέποτε) anabusn þeina ufarïddja, jah mis ni aiv (οὐδέποτε) atgaft gaitein; Cor. I, VII, 16 wa nu kannt, ei (ὅτι) aban ganasjais, aiþþau wa kannt, þatei (ὅτι) qen þeina ganasjais? Mc. IX, 11 qeþun, unte (ὅτι) qiþand bokarjos, þatei (ὅτι) helias skuli qiman; Joan. X, 36; Luc. XV, 6, 9 faginoþ þammei (ὅτι)— faginoþ unte (ὅτι); Mc. IV, 5, 6 ïn þizei ni habaida (διὰ τὸ μὴ ἔχειν) diupaizos airþos.—unte ni habaida (διὰ τὸ μὴ ἔχειν) vaurtins; Luc. X, 20 þamma ni faginoþ, ei (ὅτι) ahmans ïzvis ufhausjand, ïþ faginod, ïn þammei (ὅτι) namna ïzvara gamelida sind ïn himinam; Joan. XIV, 28 jabai frijodedeiþ mik, aiþþau jus faginode deiþ, ei (ὅτι) ïk gagga du attin, unte (ὅτι) etc.; XIII, 34 anabusn niuja giba ïzvis, ei (ἵνα) frijoþ ïzvis misso sve ïk frijoda ïzvis. þei (ἵνα) jah jus frijoþ misso ïzvis; Luc. XIV, 10 þan (ὅταν) haitaizau, anakumbei ana þamma aftumistin stada, ei biþe (ὅταν) qimai etc.; Joan. XVI, 21; Joan. VIII, 21—23 pro οὖν þanuh—þan—nu—þaruh leguntur.

«Annotatio 5.—E contrario, quo concinnitas 1231 major efficiatur, eadem pothica vocabula, licet alia synonyma praesto sint, usurpantur, non solum ubi eadem vocabula Graecus adhibuit, ex gr. Mth. V, 25 sijais vaila hugjands andastauïn þeinamma sprauto, und þatei ïs ïn viga mïþ ïmma, ïbai wan atgibai þuk sa andastaua stauïn jah sa staua þuk atgibai andbahta etc.; sed etiam ubi diversa admisit: Mth. VII, 17 sa ubila (σαπρόν) bagms akrana ubila (πονηρούς) gataujiþ; Sic etiam contraria ἀγαθόν—κακόν gothice þiuþ—unþiuþ redduntur: Rom. IX, 11; XII, 21; Cor. II, V, 11, et consequenter Mc. III, 4 ἀγαθοποιεῖν—κακοποιεῖν þiuþ taujan—unþiuþ taujan. Item Mth. VII, 25, 27 bistigqan pro προςπίπτειν et προςκόπτειν; XI, 7 sq. saiwan pro θεάσασθαι et ἰδεῖν; Luc. VII, 24 sq.; Mc. I, 20 sq. galeiþan pro ἀπέρχεσθαι et εἰςπορεύεσθαι Luc. VIII, 22 pro διέρχεσθαι et ἀναφέρεσθαι; Mc. V, 4 sq. urreisan pro ἐγείρεσθαι et ἀνιστάναι; XII, 19 bileiþan pro καταλείπειν et ἀφιέναι; XIV, 68, 71 afaikan pro ἀρνεῖσθαι et ἀναθεματίζειν; Luc. VI, 41 gaumjan pro βλέπειν et κατανοεῖν; VII, 41 qaþ et qiþ pro φησί et εἰπέ; Joan. VI, 53 sq. matjan pro φαγεῖν et τρώγειν; XII, 40, 47 ganasjan pro ἰᾶσθαι et σώζειν; Rom. VII, 15 taujan pro πράττειν et ποιεῖν; XIII, 4 (sed VII, 19 adest vaurkjan—taujan); Cor. I, IV, 5 galiuhtjan pro φωτίζειν et φανεροῦν; II, V, 16 kunnan pro εἰδέναι et γινώσκειν; XIII, 7 þugkjan pro φαίνεσθαι et εἶναι; Mc. I, 2 faura pro πρὸ προςώπου et ἔμπροσθεν; 9 qam ïesus fram (ἀπό) nazaraiþ jah daupiþs vas fram (ὑπό) ïohanne; V, 19 gagg du (εἰς) garda þeinamma du (πρός) þeinaim; XII, 26 niu gakunnaideduþ ana (ἐν) bokom mosezis ana (ἐπί) aiwatundjai? Joan. VI, 21 ana pro ἐπί et εἰς; VII, 42 us pro ἐκ et ἀπό; Cor. II, X, 13 sq. und pro ἄχρι et εἰς; VI, 14 sqq. wo dailo garaihtein miþ ungaraihtein (ἀνομίᾳ scilicet μετὰ ἀνομίας), aiþþau wo gamainduþe liuhada miþ riqiza (πρὸς σκότος), wouh þan samaqisse xristau miþ (πρός) bailiama, aiþþau wo daile galaubjandin miþ (μετὰ) ungalaubjandin, wouh þan samaqisse alhs guþs miþ (μετά) galiugam? Cor. II, IV, 10 sq. sinteino pro πάντοτε et ἀεί; Joan XVI, 30 ni vitum, ei (ὅτι) þu kant alla jah ni þarft, ei (ἵνα) þuk was fraihnai; VII, 39 ahman skuldedun niman þai galaubjandans du ïm. unte (γάρ) ni nauhþanuh vas ahma sa veiha ana ïm. unte (ὅτι) ïesus nauhþanuh ni hauhiþs vas; Cor. II, IX, 2. Item Cor. II, XI, 18 sq. unte pro ἐπεί et γάρ; Mc. X, 42 ïþ pro δέ et καί; Joan. IX, 41 pro εἰ et δέ; XI, 20 pro οὖν et δέ; XII, 8 pro γάρ et δέ; Luc. XVIII, 11 svasve pro ὥσπερ et ὡς; Joan. VI, 20 sq. þaruh pro δέ et οὖν; Mc. I, 32 þan pro δέ et ὅτε, etc.»

6) Mutatio proprie grammaticalis, seu variatio sermonis in coustructione mutanda consistit. Jam vero duplici modo sermo variatur, prout scilicet constructionis mutatio ad nomen vel ad verbum refertur.

a) Mutatio constructionis ad nomen relata. Sic

aa) Genus substantivi mutatur, ut Cor. II, V, 1 jabai airþeina unsara gards (fem. ἡ οἰκία) þizos hleiþros gatairada, ei gatimrjon us guþa habam 1232 gard unhanduvaurhtana aiveinana (masc. οἰκίαν) ïn himinam, et haec mutatio cum collectivis solemnis est, ut Mth. IX, 8 gasaiwandeins þan manageins ohtedun sildaleikjandans;

bb) Numerus substantivi mutatur: Mth. VIII, 14 svaihro paitraus lag ïn heitom—jah aflailot ïja so heito (coll. tamen § 192, 2) ; Luc. X, 25 sq. audaga augona, þoei saiwand, þoei (plur., ἅ) jus saiwiþ.—managai vildedun saiwan, þatei (sing., ἅ) jus saiwiþ, jah ni gasewun; Mc. XIV, 13, 15 gaggats ïn þo baurg jah gamoteiþ ïgqis (dual., ὑμῖυ) manna. —jah sa ïzvis (plur., ὑμῖν) taikneiþ kelikn; praecipue autem

cc) Casus substantivi mutantur: Luc. XVII, 27, 29 midjasveipains fraqistida allans.—rignida svibla jah funin jah fraqistida allaim; Cor. I, VII, 10 sq. þaim liugom haftam anabiuda, qenai fairra abin ni skaidan—jah aban qen ni fraletan; Luc. II, 46 sq. bigetun ïna hausjandan ïm—usgeisnodedun allai þai hausjandans ïs; Joan. XV, 19 jabai þis fairwaus veseiþ, aiþþau so manaseds svesans frijodedi. aþþan unte us þamma fairwau ni sijuþ etc.; Cor. II, II, 16; Cor. II, VI, 15 wo samaqisse xristau (Χριστῷ) miþ bailiama—wo samaqisse alhs (ναῷ) guþs miþ galiugam? Mc. I, 6 ïohannes gavasiþs vas taglam (τρίχας) ulbandaus jah gairda (ζώνην) filleina bi hup seinana; Eph. VI, 14 sq. standaiþ ufgaurdanai hupins (τὴν ὀσφῦν) ïzvarans sunjai—gaskohai fotum (τοὺς πόδας) ïn manviþai aivaggeljons. Item commutantur Luc. VII, 21 post gahailjan genitivus et af cum dativo, Luc. III, 16 post daupjan instrumentalis et ïn cum dativo, Cor. II, XII, 21 post ïdreigon causalis (genitivus) et ana cum dativo, partitivus et alii pro constructione casus Mc. XII, 28; IV, 5 sq.; XIV, 17; Luc. X, 4; X, 5 et 8; I, 7 et 18 post framaldrs genitivus et ïn cum dativo, IV, 25 ad determinandum tempus accusativus et du cum dativo, etc.

«Annotatio 6.—Econtra Luc. I, 55 rodida du abrahama jah fraiv ïs, hoc fraiv falsum est pro fraiva, quippe cum neque du eo modo, neque rodjan cum accusativo construatur.»

b) Mutatio constructionis ad verbum relata. Hic mutata occurrunt

aa) Numerus, ex. gr.: Luc. XIX, 30 gaggats—bigitats (dual.)— attiuhiþ (plur.); Mc. XIV, 14 sq.; Joan. VII, 20 andhof so managei jah qeþun; insuper

bb) Tempus, ex. gr.: Cor. I, VII, 22 saei ïn fraujin haitans ïst (κληθείς) skalks, fralets fraujins ïst, samaleiko saei freis haitada (κληθείς), et praecipue praeteritum et praesens historicum, vid. § 180, 3). Huc etiam referendus est Cor. I, IX, 20 et 22 ubi varþ et vas pro ἐγενόμην ponitur; de hauhiþs varþ et hauhiþs ïst Joan. XIII, 21 pro ἐδοξάσθη vid. § 181, annot.; praesertim

cc) Modus, nempe a) Imperativus et conjunctivus: Mc. VII, 14 hauseiþ (ἀκόυετε) mis allai jah fraþjaiþ (συνίετε); Joan. X, 37; β) Indicativus et conjunctivus 1233 pro futuro: Luc. I, 31 ganimis (συλλήψῃ) ïn kilþein jah gabairis (τέξῃ) sunu jah haitais (καλέσεις) namo ïs ïesu, vid. § 182, annot. 1; in indirectis interrogationibus: Joan. XII, 5 duwe þata balsan ni frabauht vas (ἐπράθη) jah fradailiþ vesi (ἐδόθη) þarbam? Cor. I, IX, 7; post jabai: Joan. XII, 26 jabai mis was andbahtjai (διακονῇ), mik laistjai.—jah jabai was mis andbahtiþ (διακονῇ), sveraiþ ïna atta; VIII, 51 sq.; post ïbai: Mc. II, 22 ni manna giutiþ vein juggata ïn balgins fairnjans, ïbai aufto distairai (ῥήσσει) vein þata niujo þans balgins jah vein usgutniþ (ἐκχεῖται) jah þai balgeis fraqistnand (ἀπολοῦνται); Mth. V, 25; Luc. XIV, 12; Joan. III, 4; post ei waiva: Rom. XI, 14 andbahti mein mikilja, ei waiva ïn aljana brigga (παραζηλώσω) leik mein jah ganasjau (σώσω) sumans us ïm; post relativum: Mc. V, 19 saei gatairiþ (ὃς ἐὰν λύσῃ) aina anabusne þizo minnistono jah laisjai (διδάξῃ) sva, sah mikils haitada ïn þiudangardjai himine, vs. 31 et 32; γ) Imperativus et infinitivus post mandatum: Luc. IX, 3 qaþ du ïm· ni vaiht nimaiþ ïn vig, nih valuns nih matibalg, nih hlaib nih skattans, nih þan tveihnos paidos haban, coll. Cor. I, IV, 9, 11 et etiam saepe ubi ex oratione recta in obliquam transitur, vid. § 271, annot. 3; δ) Infinitivus et participium post verba dicendi, vid. § 253, annot. 3; ε) Participium cum sa et verbum finitum cum saei: Joan. X, 1 saei ïnn ni atgaggiþ (ὁ μὴ εἰςερχόμενος) þairh daur—ïþ sa ïnngaggands (ὁ εἰςερχόμενος) etc.; Luc. III, 11 sa habands (ὁ ἔχων) tvos paidos, gibai þamma unhabandin, jah saei habai (ὁ ἔχων) matins samaleiko taujai etc.;

dd) Genus verbi mutatur: Rom. X, 10 hairto galaubeiþ (gr. καρδίᾳ πιστεύεται) du garaihtiþai, ïþ munda andhaitada (gr. στόματι ὁμολογεῖται) du ganistai.

7) Necnon et oratio ex finali sententia in copulativam transit: Luc. VI, 36 ni stojid, ei ni stojaindau, ni afdomjaid jah ni afdomjanda; Joan. XVI, 17 leitil ei ni saiwiþ mik jah aftra leitil jah saiwiþ mik; ex infinitivo et gerundio in finalem sententiam: Mc. X, 38 magutsu driggkan stikl, þanei ïk driggka, jah daupeinai, þizaiei ïk daupjada, ei daupjaindau (ita probabiliter, quia Gotho infinitivus passivi non erat, hinc etiam Joan. III, 4 ïbai mag manna ïn vamba aiþeins aftra galeiþan jag-gabairaidau?); Mc. III, 14 ïesus gavaurhta tvalif du visan miþ sis jah ei insandidedi ïns merjan, vid §§ 276, annot. 7 et 274, annot. 2; vel infinitivus (ut supinum) cum praepositione respondente commutatur: Mc. X, 45 sunus mans ni qam at andbahtjam ak andbahtjan (διακονηθῆναι ἀλλὰ διακονῆσαι), penuria infinitivi pass. hoc forsan exigente.

8) Necnon et vocabulorum positio etiam mutatur, ex. gr.: Joan. VIII, 32 et 36 sunja frijans ïzvis 1234 briggiþ—jabai nu sunus ïzvis frijans briggiþ; reflexivi cum silba: Cor. II, XIII, 5 ïzvis silbans fraisiþ. silbans ïzvis kauseiþ (§ 200, annot. 4) ; pronominis demonstrativi ante et post substantivum, ut Mc. VIII, 12 þata kuni taikn sokeiþ—jabai gibaidau kunja þamma taikne.