De sancta trinitate dialogi OF SAINT CYRIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA <On the Holy and
they are poured in herds, and as if entering some oak-wood or thicket of flowering grass, they devise what is profitable but when the gleam of the su
of God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it will be given to him? For surely, by the divine and intelligible light, things lacki
with your words, O you come now, come, let us bring forth what was accurately and carefully defined in the holy and all-praised synod, which was gath
that is, to the confession of faith? {B.} Yes, they say. For we will rightly censure the word homoousios, affirming that it is both a neologism and un
the Son to the Father, but would rather say that He is of like substance? {A.} They will not speak correctly, my friend, but first they will be caught
we say that he grants the attainment of such glory not to those who leap from humanity into some other nature, but to those who from a wicked choice a
truth that which is not as it is named, at least in the divinely inspired Scriptures? Why then do they say that the Son is not of this world at all? {
and again: For the Word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and
I thank you. {A.} Therefore, going to the hierophant Moses himself, and striving to set up the most clear power of the things done and said through hi
us, and let not God speak to us, lest we die, said Israel and this they sought in Horeb on the day of the assembly, when God was in the form of fire
{B.} You speak well, since indeed the divine Paul also writes: But Christ, having appeared as a high priest of the good things to come, through the g
of the Father according to his own will, and he became man, preserving in himself the dignity of his own nature completely inviolate and unadulterated
natural, but rather voluntary the union of the Son to be with the Father and God? For he will differ, I think, in no way, if it is so and is true, fro
Father and Son, but with each one both being and subsisting, and said to have its own existence, the identity of substance guarantees the union. {B.}
will be laid down in word, as having been removed from the substance of God the Father. {B.} For they maintain that the Son is otherwise than the Fath
God in glory and in nature, to whom in every way and in every sense would belong as his own good the unbegotten for this reason, to those subject to
they deem it right to accept and understand the matter naturally. {A.} Therefore, they persuade both themselves and others to think that the name of s
superior even to being seen by anyone, the power of the words shows us is it not so? {B.} True. {A.} If, then, anyone should say that the Father and
what sort of approach should we consider for these things? {Α.} For what else could show us that the word of truth is simple, than that it is free fro
as poets say, having loosed the cable, and as if setting sail from shore and moorings, let us launch our discourse like a merchant ship onto the open
by way of being begotten it will be otherwise and would not be understood as the same. For if it is not one and another, but you think it is the same,
conceived, yet not yet distinctly the person of one specifically. But when saying Father and Son and Holy Spirit, he makes the declaration not from th
with rejoinders to common notions, with Christ being present and defending us, that we may, as far as possible, lay them waste, singing opportunely th
We must proceed. {B.} It is not otherwise. {A.} Consider then, or rather let those who ignorantly treat unbegotten as having the force of a definiti
has occurred. {B.} How do you mean? 428 {A.} For instance, when we want to state what fire or water is, or of what sort each is by nature, concerning
forgivingly, and if they should choose to move on to other topics, let us proceed to those, so that no account of our arrogance may be furnished to th
having appeared. And indeed we ourselves have been taught, he says, to name God thus and to say in our prayers: Our Father, who art in heaven. {A.}
be formed according to that which is unbegotten? {A.} I do not say this, but I thought it necessary to point out the absurdity of the notions arising
you say he is in identity and consubstantial with God the Father, you will no longer hesitate, in all probability, to think that he also always co-exi
is not easy, but it is possible nonetheless for those willing to measure. For there is nothing among existing things that can escape the account of it
the word became steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense, how shall we escape, if we neglect so great a salvatio
in a truth of generation that does not introduce to it the necessity of being in every way and altogether adorned in the nature of the one who begot t
of God's energy, fire, which is caustic, and also water, which knows how to cool, 442 but both are works of one, the simple. And if these are works of
to leave it as unattainable. For I think that no one at all among those who have soberly considered that it is fitting to concede victory to those who
of all such things and not without purpose He who relies on falsehoods, this one will shepherd winds, and he himself will chase winged birds. For he
in a place, somewhere certainly, and in size and quantity. And since it has quantity, let it not escape circumscription. And a swarm of other thoughts
the generation of an incorporeal nature, why will he not rather charge himself with ignorance? But that which is greater and better than what is accor
indeed, by courses from the depth to the above and outward, the word fashions for us the generation as in some way substantial. And he seems to be som
I do not think I can make clear what manner of the divine generation might be conceived by us, but rather this, that if God is Father, He did not find
I would know. {B.} For, I think, adding that too, they will say, that if indeed the Son is unwanted by the Father, He has begotten not willingly, but
and he will very well observe the nature of things, and he will consider that of things to be done or not, both will and unwillingness have power, but
For he is what he is not unwillingly, not submitting to a necessary will in this respect, just as, for example, if he might be conceived as holy and g
he shapes the forms of bronze figures or, at any rate, works on something else of a similar kind. Does it seem to you, then, that he is moved in an eq
if from unbegottenness still, that is from potentiality, he should proceed not without time into generation in actuality, even if the interval were th
{A.} Therefore, what in another way is, I do not understand very well, but perhaps you would state it yourself, if you happen to know it. For it is
our God, no other shall be reckoned with him. He found all the way of knowledge and gave it to Jacob his servant and to Israel his beloved. And after
delivered to us from the sacred Scriptures. For the Father, being alone by nature and truly God, would not otherwise accept the Son as being alone God
less, since the fullness of God the Father would not have been entirely sufficient to save us. But I say that to think and to say these things are bla
and will the Spirit be ranked with the Son and be inscribed in the one nature of the divinity, or not? {Β.} They say that there is one true God, the F
having improvised the generation of all other things: Let us make man in our image and likeness. And having thrown in something brief in between: A
He has created him a new form in the beginning, that is, in likeness to Himself, but rather He would have placed in him another form and appearance, i
of stupidity and ignorance is the mind, to say or at least ever to suppose that the Son is better than the Father, who has his begetter as a sort of r
the measure of his own nature. Then how will the divine proclamation to us, I mean the evangelical one, which persuades us that we must assent to the
and from them did one of the earth-born spring up? Or do you say that that is better and true, that he has been styled a brother and was placed in the
nature to have been introduced, when it also first entered? {B.} By no means, as is likely for light always was. {A.} Why then indeed do they raise u
And even if God and the Father were said alone to have immortality, the dignity will be essential in the Son also, and He will in every way be called
what of this? {A.} Because for one who has a nature of his own devoid of immortality and of life, but gains this thing as adopted from another, I thin
Further, to try now to conceive the corresponding element, at least according to a probable argument, as the reverse of the mystery of the economy wit
bestow its own properties upon beings. But to think in this way is frantic but the things of God are worthy of acceptance, and He refers it to the hi
they arrive at such a measure as to think that the Son must be adoptive and ranked with the others, even if, blushing at their own inventions and as i
choosing to insist and to think that the one who has begotten 491 dwells in the Son? And besides, I think, it will be necessary to say this too: is it
His Spirit dwelling in us? And to this I say, if the Spirit of God the Father, in whom He both gives life and sanctifies the nature of those things br
we have received. Would a good gift and a perfect gift be anything else, according to what you yourself think, except to partake of the Holy Spirit?
those who have believed? For My sheep, He says, hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me and I give them eternal life, and they shall ne
calling? For in everything, he said, commending ourselves as ministers of God. And elsewhere somewhere concerning certain ones: Are they minister
of substance and that the Son has been truly revealed from her, signifying this through this. {B.} How do you say? {A.} For do you think this argument
a good tree and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad. {B.} You have spoken excellently. {A.} For it is a clear proof of truly the u
would be at a disadvantage in glory, and would He not rather be in an equal and similar state in every single respect with the one who has begotten? {
for in him we both move and have our being, as a wise word has somewhere said. {B.} True. {A.} Let the word of blasphemy, then, go simply against him
John will by no means be convicted of speaking falsely, saying openly that: Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples which a
Not at all. {A.} And very eagerly for there is no difficulty. Has He given His own Son for the life of the world? {B.} Absolutely. {A.} And surely th
Therefore, it is true that each subsists together and is done away with together through both, and with one subsisting, that for which it is said and
he is under guardians and managers until the date set by the father so we also, when we were children, were enslaved to the elements of the world bu
more absurdly, for those who have not yet been enriched with the light of truth have come to know the true and by nature God but we, the chosen ones,
whether Christ himself would also be ranked with those who pay tribute and be taxed, or whether he refuses the payment-, the divine disciple immediate
to say that the divine and ineffable nature has been forced, or rather, has been overcome by creation, how is this not utterly senseless? Therefore, h
meaning, firstborn and only-begotten. For how could each be applied to one and the same, and be understood as true? {B.} It could not be otherwise, as
he raised up to what is above nature, to be called gods, so, I think, he would in no way bring him down to what is contrary to nature, to be ranked wi
and of the Father. {B.} But if they too should choose to think it necessary to call him only-begotten because he alone has come from the Father alone,
with the Son revealing the Father dare to say that he is still inactive concerning creation? {Β.} Most perilous. {Α.} And that other point is also sen
what has been written. {A.} And how would it not be a small and mean thing for the nature of the Son to have fashioned a sparrow? And for what reason,
believing the Only-Begotten to have been revealed as God. For in this way, having disproved the charge of seeming to have been deceived, we might thru
was formed for it was without God in the world but since it has known the Son through faith, it has appeared within a good hope, and has escaped and
{B.} You speak well. {A.} If then, having abandoned the notion that they must beguile us with fine words, they cast out the Son as far as possible fro
For like is always dear to like, and what is created would not be separated from what is created, at least in respect to being created things. For wha
we will either abolish [the term] begetting because of their saying he was created, or abandoning [the term] created, we will grant that he was begott
to possess the creative power, but at the same time to miss what is fitting, and so to be deprived of the highest strength? {B.} How? {A.} Do you not
A most beautiful and excellent lot for God is to be able to create, since through this He is known by us, who and how great He is. For from the great
My good man. But which way should we believe He ought to create, distributing to created things the starting point for existence, the will for them to
what would our opponents [say] to us? For they will by no means cease misrepresenting the truth and those things which would follow to be wisely under
will ever be inactive, if the Father wished to take away what was given and to ward off the energy of the Son's nature, by which, as they say, being m
FIFTH DISCOURSE That the properties of the Godhead and the glory are naturally in
name, that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Chris
Paul for instance [states] the cause of the incarnation, saying that the Word of God took not on him the nature of angels, but of the seed of Abraham,
would you senselessly mutilate the sound and pious account of him? {B.} We are in danger. {A.} Let us then put away the charge of impiety and the accu
Without effort, O good sir for the matter is hard to go through, except that from necessary reasonings, it will be very possible to hunt down the tru
the same in form, he made clear, saying 554 He who sees me sees the one who sent me. And since the Father is seen and known in the Son brilliantly
a right-minded person would not think it the nature of God therefore the Father is not will, but being conceived in His own existence, He has His own
Show us the Father, and he did not say the will of the Father. But the Son, presenting Himself as an image of the Father, says, He who has seen me,
to have in himself. And indeed also elsewhere, having been a burden to no one: As the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so he
but would rather have its being through all, having existence without beginning and without end. But if they think 561 their argument is wise and care
in himself, so also he has given to the Son to have life in himself. {Α.} Add what is missing, or know that you wrong the truth. {Β.} And what is tha
that But if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mort
water for my head and a fountain of tears for my eyes, and I shall weep for this people day and night? Let every lover of God and pious person cry ou
for our slips and sins, let the Only-Begotten have the greatest possible grace. But let him know that the occasion for his deifying glory was humanity
to distribute to each the rewards for what they have done and to justify whomsoever He would choose (for it is God who justifies, who is he that cond
attributing the pettiness of humanity to the nature that is above all, as if it were properly attached to it, but having decided to make a very clear
Therefore, there are very many sons by nature, or rather, more than can be numbered and let the breadth of this blasphemy be set aside, if all are so
painting a shadow and believing that he is honored with mere names but they will openly reject his being God by nature and in truth. Then who is so d
slander? For let it be granted that even that which is excessively superior sometimes willingly lowers its own glory to the littleness of those placed
to understand. {A.} What then does the hand of the Father signify to us? Whether the all-creative energy, that is, the power? For in some way the word
being hard and difficult to lead, 580 Israel. For it is written thus: As an eagle would shelter his nest, spreading his wings, he received them and t
they drown herds together. Tell me, then, did Christ grant the honor to such loathsome and unclean spirits, and did he allow what seemed good to them
the saying, and not at all on its own account (for it is written correctly), but by the perversions of those on the opposite side being pushed into se
having taken. Do I not seem to you to say these things most excellently? {B.} Most elegantly, indeed. {A.} Since, then, the graceless and uncomely as
587 {A.} Concerning equality, then, I think, and indeed that of God the Father
In addition to these things, the Son himself also said, speaking to the Jews: Is it not written in your law, 'I said, you are gods'? If he called the
{B.} John the Baptist has testified, saying that I have seen the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it remained on him. {A.} Therefore,
the principle of difference, placing each one in every way without parts for otherwise there would be two gods but since the Godhead is and is conce
they will again condemn his participation and say that the sanctification from God the Father through the Spirit has been introduced and given to him
of God and the Father? And how also is He the effulgence and stamp of His substance? For He did not become the stamp in time, but this He was by natur
when unholy audacity is assailed, I would in no way hesitate to say even something that leads to absurdity For would not the ability to sanctify befi
they have kept your word. Now they have known that all things that you have given me are from you, for the words which you gave me I have given them,
a man, who not having as the fruit of his own nature the ability to perform things befitting God, receives it somehow by union and the ineffable concu
to raise their 603 voices at the appropriate times, have decided to throw everything into confusion up and down and to mix it all up. And yet how is i
and God, as from the person of those justified by faith: But I in righteousness shall appear before your face I shall be satisfied when your glory a
indeed living, having economically granted to death the appearance of victory, will clearly be opened also to the other, that is, what is manifest in
But if it seems so to anyone else, that to the one who is truly God by nature belongs the power over all that has come into being, and all things are
for you have found favor with God, and behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a Son, and you will call his name Jesus for he will save his p
{B.} It will be consistent then for the argument is clear and true. {A.} And what, indeed, did the minister of our divine mysteries learn that he cal
from me, and I will give you the nations for your inheritance, and the ends of the earth for your possession. For where would the Son’s inheritance b
they will serve. His authority, an eternal authority, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom shall not be destroyed. {B.} Clear and incontroverti
will be captured by powers. Would not this, then, be loud laughter, or rather, madness? {B.} Very much so. {A.} Following, therefore, the faith of the
of them. Or would not the Word who is from Him and in Him be conceived, tell me, as other than the Father and God, at least in being, I mean, accordi
for the apostles to choose to think on Christ is a great thing, and they are accustomed to make him their boast for the working through them? {B.} Ver
by the things done by both Him and the Father, He gave full assurance, adding: Amen, amen, I say to you, 622 the Son can do nothing of Himself, unles
Worship belongs to the humanity yoked to God and bound tight by the yoke of slavery with obedience, and indeed also not knowing what is the counsel an
that to me every knee shall bow and every tongue confess. The divine Paul, very rightly positing the Son as consubstantial with the Father, and knowi
that it is necessary for God to be worshipped in order and with measure? {B.} Not in the least. {A.} Correctly, friend. For it would be fitting only f
For how could it not be so? {Α.} If, then, the Spirit of the Father is the Son's own, how will he be ignorant of any of the things hidden in God, sinc
Do you hear how, having refuted the opinion as unseemly and more fitting for the ignorance of the Jews, he commands that one should rather choose to d
for him to seem so on this point, how is it not utterly stale, although very many things for us, even if they exist among created things, have a singu
Son. It is impious and utterly shocking to mutilate it into a dyad, and, as it were, to dare to contract the nature of the Godhead, although indeed th
Spirit to do this. {A.} In what way then, my friend, if the Spirit is not God? {B.} Because even if one should choose, he says, to be reverent towards
he is convicted by all, he is judged by all, the secrets of his heart are made manifest and so 638 falling on his face he will worship God, declaring
conformed to the image of His Son, these He also called. For we are remolded into an image of the Holy Spirit, that is, of God, through faith and san
clearly and accurately uniting His Spirit to God, and openly teaching that our participation in God could not happen in any other way except through t
glory of condemnation, will not the ministry of righteousness much more abound in glory? And concerning himself and the other apostles. Who has made
This condition would follow, O Hermias, and very reasonably, for a created and made nature, but it would stand very far apart from God. {B.} Certainly
the holy one, but rather serves ministerially the grace from another, how has Christ been anointed as king, having received the Spirit as an anointing
not a messenger nor an angel, but the Lord himself saved them, because he loved them and spared them. He himself redeemed them, and took them up, and
of a vote, to be able to achieve for themselves and for others the reaching of royal thrones, and to begin to hold illustrious rule and sceptres, God
as from a spring of God, at least in my opinion, power is upon each of those who are empowered, just as, indeed, wisdom also, and the things of which
of God, shall we be disposed to follow after the Creator, and through a division into a degenerate otherness, do we manage His pre-eminence in the mos
having accepted the glory, we will walk the straight path, freeing the mind from nods, as it were, and from an inclination toward anything whatever th
he adduces, saying: But this he spoke concerning 657 the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were about to receive. Behold, again, clearly and pl
a mode of otherness, I mean, of that which is according to substance? Or how would those not be found unsound and foolish who number with creation tha
I do not think I can make clear what manner of the divine generation might be conceived by us, but rather this, that if God is Father, He did not find Himself to be what He is in time; for He is always in the same state and condition, and superior to the change conceived in both respects; for He is all-perfect, neither being in need of fulfillment in any good thing, nor indeed enduring the lapse into things that are wont to cause grief; surely the manifestation and existence of the one begotten is in every way co-introduced with Him, not being later in time, nor indeed coming after the glory of the Begetter, because it is necessary in every way and in every respect in the case of God for the Father to be co-conceived and to co-exist always with the Son, and in turn the Son with the Father, witnessed through Himself to an unoriginate antiquity, even if He exists by generation, as from the Father according to nature. And when the divine Paul calls the Son for us the radiance of the glory of God the Father, and indeed that He is the character of His substance, he will surely seal, as I suppose, the argument just made by us, as it has been made quite blamelessly, and is filled with votes for orthodoxy and truth. {B.} How did you say? {A.} Suppose me to speak again, having considered the matter somewhat in this way: that what has been radiated by something might be, I suppose, this light, which conveys 453 to those outside the knowledge of the radiating substance itself, and always impressing itself on the senses through the eyes, or at least associating with bodies in some other manner of approach; it allows one to conceive what its root and origin, which sends it forth and radiates it, is by nature. Let the argument be set forth, taking as an example the nature of the sun and the ray poured forth from it. For what could that sun declare the splendor sent forth from it to be by nature. The nature of the sun would not endure to know at all of division, or cutting, or effluence, or passion, even though it sends forth the light from itself profusely and substantially, but it is wholly in it, and if it should be poured forth, it would have its own light again in itself, not being torn from its roots in being diffused and seeming somehow through this to run into its own otherness. For reason, having divided it, imagines the sun by itself without parts, what its substance is, and the light poured forth in it and from it, its own indeed, it will very well arrange into an indivisible otherness, as in bare and mere concepts, because of its procession from it to what is outside. And that it would be utterly ridiculous to imagine the sun's generation to be older, and the power of the luminous energy in it to be even a little later, I would not think he would doubt at all whose mind is sound and strong. For it is equivalent to saying that the sun does not even exist, if it does not have co-existing with it that through which it is conceived to be what it is. Therefore, having correctly fashioned as a kind of representation the power of sensible examples, taking it up in concepts that proceed to the highest conclusion, you will not corrupt the divine generation by senselessly admitting divisions upon it and effluence and passion. For in the case of the substance that is highest of all, the generation is impassible, and indeed the existence of the offspring is substantial and free from division, and runs together with the Begetter and is indispensably co-conceived and co-introduced. For the wise John also testified to the Son's being without beginning in time, saying, "In the beginning was the Word," and again after this, "He who is, and who was, and who is to come." {B.} The argument concerning this has been worked out by us as well as possible, my friend. But you think, likely, to be free of difficulties, and to need nothing else for the proof that the Father in no way seems to pre-exist the Son, 454 but that they must be conceived as of one nature and co-existent; but those things do not yet come to mind, having an approach that is utterly difficult and very steep. {A.} What sort of things are you referring to? {B.} Know that they will ask you, for they are sharp in arguments, whether God the Father begot the Son voluntarily or, on the other hand, involuntarily. {A.} Then, where might the mischief of such clever inventions of theirs end up, as I would most gladly
θείας γεννήσεως τίς ἂν νοοῖτο πρὸς ἡμῶν ὁ τρόπος οὐκ οἶμαι σαφηνιεῖν, ἐκεῖνο δὲ μᾶλλον ὡς εἴπερ ἐστὶ Πατὴρ ὁ Θεός, οὐκ ἐν
χρόνῳ τὸ εἶναι τοῦθ' ὅπερ ἐστὶν εὑράμενος· ἔστι γὰρ ἀεὶ κατὰ ταὐτὰ καὶ ὡσαύτως ἔχων καὶ τροπῆς ἀμείνων τῆς ἐπ' ἀμφοῖν νοουμένης·
παντέλειος γάρ, οὔτε τῆς εἰς ὁτιοῦν τῶν ἀγαθῶν πληρώσεως ὑπάρχων ἐπιδεής, οὔτε μὴν τὸν ἐπὶ τοῖς πεφυκόσι λυπεῖν ὑπομένων ὄλισθον·
συνεισκρίνεταί που πάντως αὐτῷ καὶ ἡ τοῦ τεχθέντος δήλωσίς τε ὁμοῦ καὶ ὕπαρξις οὐχ ὑστερίζουσα κατὰ χρόνον, οὔτε μὴν κατόπιν
ἰοῦσα τῆς τοῦ τεκόντος δόξης διά γε τὸ χρῆναι πάντη τε καὶ πάντως ἐπὶ Θεοῦ συνεπινοεῖσθαί τε καὶ συνυπάρχειν ἀεὶ Υἱῷ μὲν Πατέρα,
Πατρὶ δὲ αὖ τὸν Υἱόν, πρὸς ἄναρχον ἀρχαιότητα δι' ἑαυτοῦ μαρτυρούμενον, εἰ καὶ ἔστι γεννητῶς, ὡς ἐκ Πατρὸς κατὰ φύσιν. Ἀπαύγασμα
δὲ τῆς δόξης τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς ὀνομάζων ἡμῖν τὸν Υἱὸν ὁ θεσπέσιος Παῦλος, καὶ μὴν ὅτι καὶ χαρακτήρ ἐστι τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ,
κατασφραγιεῖ δή που, καθάπερ ἐγᾦμαι, τὸν ἀρτίως ἡμῖν γεγονότα λόγον, ὡς πεποίηται μὲν ἀμωμήτως κομιδῇ, μεθύει δὲ ψήφοις ταῖς
εἰς ὀρθότητα καὶ ἀλήθειαν. {Β.} Πῶς ἔφης; {Α.} Οἴου δέ με πάλιν ὧδέ πῃ διεσκεμμένον τὸ χρῆμα εἰπεῖν· ὅτι τὸ ὑπό του τυχὸν
ἐξηυγασμένον εἴη δ' ἄν που φῶς, οἶμαι, τουτί, τῆς ἀπαυγαζούσης οὐσίας αὐτὸ διακομίζον 453 τοῖς ἔξω τὴν εἴδησιν, καὶ ταῖς δι'
ὀμμάτων αἰσθήσεσιν ἐγχρίμπτον ἀεί, ἢ γοῦν καθ' ἕτερόν τινα τρόπον προσβολῆς ὁμιλοῦν τοῖς σώμασι· τὸ τί κατὰ φύσιν ἐστὶν ἡ
προϊεῖσά τε καὶ ἐξαστράπτουσα ῥίζα τε αὐτοῦ καὶ γένεσις ἐφῆκε νοεῖν. Συντετάχθω δὲ ὁ λόγος εἰς παράδειγμα λαβὼν τὴν ἡλίου
φύσιν καὶ τὴν ἐξ αὐτοῦ προχεομένην αὐγήν. Τί γὰρ κατὰ φύσιν ἐκεῖνος τὸ ἐξ αὐτοῦ προϊέμενον σέλας ἀποφήνειεν ἄν. ∆ιαίρεσιν
δὲ ὅλως, ἤτοι τὴν τομὴν καὶ ἀπορροὴν καὶ πάθος, οὐδ' ὅσον εἰδέναι τυχὸν ἀνάσχοιτο ἂν ἡ ἡλίου φύσις, καίτοι χύδην καὶ οὐσιωδῶς
τὸ ἐξ αὐτῆς προϊεῖσα φῶς, ἀλλ' ἔστι μὲν ὁλοκλήρως ἐν αὐτῷ, καὶ εἰ προχέοιτο τυχόν, ἔχοι δὲ αὖ ἐν ἑαυτῷ τὸ ἴδιον φῶς, οὐκ ἀπορριζούμενον
ἐν τῷ διαχεῖσθαι καὶ δοκεῖν πως ἤδη διὰ τούτου καὶ εἰς ἰδικὴν ἑτερότητα δραμεῖν. Ἀποδιελὼν γὰρ ὁ λόγος ἥλιον μὲν ἀναμέρος
αὐτὸν καθ' αὑτόν, τὴν οὐσίαν ὅ τί ποτέ ἐστι φαντάζεται, τὸ δ' ἐν αὐτῷ τε καὶ ἐξ αὐτοῦ προχεόμενον φῶς, ἴδιον μὲν αὐτοῦ, πλὴν
εἰς ἀμέριστον ἑτερότητα τὴν ὡς ἐν ψιλαῖς καὶ μόναις ἐννοίαις, εὖ μάλα διοικιεῖ, διά τοι τὴν ἐξ αὐτοῦ πρὸς τὸ ἔξω πρόοδον.
Ὅτι δὲ δὴ γελοῖον ἂν εἴη παντελῶς τὸ πρεσβυτέραν μὲν τὴν ἡλίου φαντάζεσθαι γένεσιν, ὑστερίζουσαν δὲ κἂν γοῦν τι βραχὺ τῆς
ἐνούσης αὐτῷ φωτοειδοῦς ἐνεργείας τὴν δύναμιν, οὐκ ἂν οἰηθείην ἐνδοιάσειν ὅλως τὸν ᾧπερ ἂν εἴη σώφρων τε καὶ ἐρρωμένος ὁ νοῦς.
Ἴσον γὰρ ἥλιον μηδὲ εἶναι λέγειν, εἰ μὴ συνυπάρχον ἔχοι τὸ δι' ὃ νοεῖται τοῦθ' ὅπερ ἐστίν. Οὐκοῦν, ἀνατύπωσιν ὥσπερ τινὰ διαπεπλασμένην
ὀρθῶς τῶν ἐν αἰσθήσει παρα δειγμάτων τὴν δύναμιν ὡς ἐν ἐννοίαις ἑλὼν ταῖς εἰς λῆξιν ἰούσαις τὴν ἀνωτάτω, τὴν θείαν γέννησιν
οὐ καταφθερεῖς, τομὰς ἐπ' αὐτὴν καὶ ἀπορροὴν καὶ πάθος ἀσυνέτως εἰσδε δεγμένος. Ἐπὶ γάρ τοι τῆς ἀνωτάτω πασῶν οὐσίας ἀπαθὴς
μὲν ἡ γέννησις, καὶ μὴν καὶ οὐσιώδης ἡ τοῦ γεννήματος ὕπαρξις καὶ διατομῆς ἐλευθέρα, καὶ τῷ τεκόντι συνθέουσα καὶ ἀπαραιτήτως
συννοουμένη τε καὶ συνεισβαίνουσα. Τὸ γὰρ ἄναρχον ἐν χρόνῳ μεμαρτύρηκε τῷ Υἱῷ καὶ ὁ σοφὸς Ἰωάννης, "Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ Λόγος" εἰπών,
καὶ αὖ ἐπὶ τούτοις· "Ὁ ὤν, ὁ ἦν, ὁ ἐρχόμενος." {Β.} Ἐκπεπόνηται μὲν ἡμῖν ὡς ἄριστά γε, ὦ τᾶν, ὁ περὶ τούτου λόγος. Οἴει δέ
που, κατὰ τὸ εἰκός, ἀπηλλάχθαι πραγμάτων, καὶ ἑτέρου δεῖσθαι μηδενὸς εἰς ἀπόδειξιν τοῦ προϋφεστηκέναι μὲν οὐδαμῶς τοῦ Υἱοῦ
τὸν Πατέρα δοκεῖν, 454 συμφυᾶ δὲ δεῖν καὶ συνυπάρχοντα νοεῖν· ἀφικνεῖται δὲ οὔπω κατὰ νοῦν ἐκεῖνα, δυσπρόσιτον κομιδῇ καὶ
ἀνάντη λίαν ἔχοντα τὴν προσβολήν. {Α.} Τὰ ποῖα ἄττα φῄς; {Β.} Ἐρησομένους ἴσθι τοι, δριμεῖς γὰρ εἰς λόγους, πότερόν ποτε θελητῶς
ἤγουν ἀνεθελήτως ὁ Θεὸς καὶ Πατὴρ ἐκτέτοκε τὸν Υἱόν. {Α.} Εἶτα, ὅποι ποτὲ ἄρα κατασκήψειεν ἂν τὸ κακούργημα αὐτοῖς τῶν οὕτω
δεινῶν εὑρημάτων, ὡς ἥδιστα ἂν
