3

Of Saint Anastasius, patriarch of Antioch. ...................................................... 109 Of Saint Nemesius, bishop of Emesa. ................................................................... 109 Of the same: In what way is man rational, and what is the internal word, and what is

the uttered word?........................................................................................................................... 109

(280) Of Saint Maximus, from his syllogisms concerning the wills: what is

the natural will, and what is the gnomic will? .................................................................................... 109

Of the same, from the epistle to Marinus the presbyter, What is will, and what is

choice? ............................................................................................................................ 109

VARIOUS DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 109

Of our holy and God-bearing Fathers, concerning the two energies of our Lord

and God and Savior Jesus Christ. p. 280. .................................................. 109

Of Saint Justin, philosopher and finally martyr, from the one to Euphrasius

the sophist, concerning Providence and Faith, a discourse of which the beginning is: "The Word is immaculate." ........ 109

Of the same, from the same discourse. ................................................................................. 109

Of Saint Alexander, from the epistle to Aiglon, bishop of Cynopolis, against

the Arians. ........................................................................................................... 110

Of Gregory of Nyssa......................................................................................................... 110

Of Chrysostom.......................................................................................................... 110

Of Saint Cyril...................................................................................................... 110

Of Saint Basil. .................................................................................................... 111

Of the same, from Against Eunomius............................................................................... 111

Of Saint Gregory of Nyssa. ..................................................................................... 111

Of Cyril. ....................................................................................................................... 111

Of Saint Ambrose, bishop of Milan, from the one to Gratian the

emperor's second discourse. .................................................................................................... 112

Of Saint Basil, from the syllogisms against Eunomius. ................................. 112

MAXIMI DISPUTATIO CUM PYRRHO (288) .................................................................. 112

ANNOTATION OF THE INQUIRY THAT TOOK PLACE for the sake of the matters raised concerning the ecclesiastical dogmas, in the presence of Gregory the most pious patrician, and of the most holy bishops who were present with him, and of the other God-loving and glorious men, between Pyrrhus, who became patriarch of Constantinople, and Maximus the most devout monk, in the month of July, of the 3rd indiction. Pyrrhus indeed was defending the innovation introduced by himself and his predecessor in Byzantium; that is, of one will; while Maximus was advocating for the patristic and apostolic teaching that had come down to us from above; through the aforementioned extraordinary man, I mean Gregory the most honorable patrician, the said men, that is Pyrrhus and Maximus, having been brought face to face with each other. And Pyrrhus began the discussion with Maximus, speaking thus.......................................................... 112

Of the blessed monk Maximus, On the Soul. p. 353. ........................................ 136

What is the apprehensive criterion of the soul................................................................. 136

Whether the soul exists. .................................................................................................................. 136

Whether the soul is a substance. .................................................................................................. 137

Whether the soul is incorporeal. .................................................................................................... 137

Whether the soul is simple. ............................................................................................................. 137

3

Τοῦ ἁγίου Ἀναστασίου πατριάρχου Ἀντιοχείας. ...................................................... 109 Τοῦ ἁγίου Νεμεσίου ἐπισκόπου Ἐμέσης. ................................................................... 109 Τοῦ αὐτοῦ· Κατά τί λογικός ὁ ἄνθρωπος, καί τί ἐνδιάθετος λόγος, καί τί

προφορικός;........................................................................................................................... 109 (280) Τοῦ ἁγίου Μαξίμου, ἐκ τῶν περί θελημάτων αὐτοῦ συλλογισμῶν· τί

φυσικόν θέλημα, καί τί γνωμικόν; .................................................................................... 109 Τοῦ αὐτοῦ, ἐκ τῆς πρός Μαρῖνον πρεσβύτερον ἐπιστολῆς, Τί θέλησις, καί τί

προαίρεσις; ............................................................................................................................ 109 ΟΡΟΙ ∆ΙΑΦΟΡΟΙ ............................................................................................................. 109 Τῶν ἁγίων καί θεοφόρων Πατέρων ἡμῶν, περί τῶν δύο ἐνεργειῶν τοῦ Κυρίου

καί Θεοῦ καί Σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ. Σελ. 280. .................................................. 109 Τοῦ ἁγίου Ἰουστίνου φιλοσόφου, καί τέλος μάρτυρος, ἐκ τοῦ πρός Εὐφράσιον

σοφιστήν, περί Προνοίας καί Πίστεως λόγου, οὗ ἡ ἀρχή· "Ἄχραντος ὁ Λόγος." ........ 109 Τοῦ αὐτοῦ, ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ λόγου. ................................................................................. 109 Τοῦ ἁγίου Ἀλεξάνδρου, ἐκ τῆς πρός Αἴγλωνα ἐπίσκοπον Κυνοπόλεως κατά

Ἀρειανῶν ἐπιστολῆς. ........................................................................................................... 110 Γρηγορίου Νύσσης......................................................................................................... 110 Τοῦ Χρυσοστόμου.......................................................................................................... 110 Τοῦ ἁγίου Κυρίλλου...................................................................................................... 110 Τοῦ ἁγίου Βασιλείου. .................................................................................................... 111 Τοῦ αὐτοῦ, ἐκ τῶν κατ' Εὐνομίου............................................................................... 111 Τοῦ ἁγίου Γρηγορίου Νύσσης. ..................................................................................... 111 Κυρίλλου. ....................................................................................................................... 111 Τοῦ ἁγίου Ἀμβροσίου ἐπισκόπου Μεδιολάνων, ἐκ τοῦ πρός Γρατιανόν τόν

βασιλέα δευτέρου λόγου. .................................................................................................... 112 Τοῦ ἁγίου Βασιλείου, ἐκ τῶν κατά Εὐνομίου συλλογισμῶν. ................................. 112

MAXIMI DISPUTATIO CUM PYRRHO (288) .................................................................. 112

ΠΑΡΑΣΗΜΕΙΩΣΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΓΕΝΟΜΕΝΗΣ ΖΗΤΗΣΕΩΣ χάριν τῶν κεκινημένων περί τῶν ἐκκλησιαστικῶν δογμάτων, παρουσίᾳ Γρηγορίου τῆ εὐσεβεστάτου πατρικίου, καί τῶν συνευρεθέντων αὐτῷ ὁσιωτάτων ἐπισκόπων, καί λοιπῶν θεοφιλῶν καί ἐνδόξων ἀνδρῶν, παρά Πύῤῥου, τοῦ γενομένου πατριάρχου Κωνσταντινουπόλεως, καί Μαξίμου τοῦ εὐλαβεστάτου μοναχοῦ, μηνί Ἰουλίῳ, ἰνδικτίωνος γ´. Πύῤῥου μέν συμμαχοῦντος τῇ παρεισαχθείσῃ παρ᾿ αὐτοῦ τε , καί τοῦ πρό αὐτοῦ ἐν τῷ Βυζαντίῳ καινοτομίᾳ· τουτέστιν· ἑνός θελήματος· Μαξίμου δέ συνηγοροῦντος τῇ ἄνωθεν εἰς ἡμᾶς ἐλθούσῃ πατρικῇ τε καί ἀποστολικῇ διδασκαλίᾳ· διά τοῦ ῥηθέντος ὑπερφυοῦς ἀνδρός, φημί δέ Γρηγορίου τοῦ ὑπερτίμου πατρικίου, τῶν λεχθέντων ἀνδρῶν· τουτέστιν Πύῤῥου καί Μαξίμου, ἀλλήλοις προσοψισθέντων. Προκατήρξατο δέ τῆς πρός Μάξιμον διαλέξεως ὁ Πύῤῥος , οὕτως εἰπών.......................................................... 112

Τοῦ μακαρίου Μαξίμου μοναχοῦ, Περί ψυχῆς. Σελ. 353. ........................................ 136 Τί τό καταληπτικόν τῆς ψυχῆς κριτήριον................................................................. 136 Εἰ ἔστι ψυχή. .................................................................................................................. 136 Εἰ οὐσία ἐστίν ἡ ψυχή. .................................................................................................. 137 Εἰ ἀσώματος ἡ ψυχή. .................................................................................................... 137 Εἰ ἁπλῆ ἡ ψυχή. ............................................................................................................. 137