4

If the soul is immortal. ..................................................................................................... 137 If the soul is rational. .......................................................................................................... 138 What is soul. .......................................................................................................................... 138 And what is mind. ...................................................................................................................... 139 What is intellect. ....................................................................................................................... 139 What is character. ....................................................................................................................... 139 What is sensation. .................................................................................................................... 139 What is spirit........................................................................................................................ 139

S.MAXIMI CONFESSORIS ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

EPISTOLAE .............................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

A. HORTATORY DISCOURSE p. 364............................................................................ 139 In the form of a letter ........................................................................................................ 139 To the servant of God, Lord George, the all-praised prefect of Africa.

................................................................................................................................................. 139 SCHOLIA. .......................................................................................................................... 149 B. By the same, to John the Cubicularius, concerning love.................................. 149 SCHOLIA. .......................................................................................................................... 155 C. By the same, to the same...................................................................................... 155 (413) D. By the same, to the same, concerning sorrow according to God. ........................... 156 E. By the same, to Constantine.............................................................................. 159 F. By the same, to the most holy and most blessed archbishop John,

concerning that the soul is incorporeal. ............................................................................ 160 G. By the same, to John the presbyter, concerning the soul having intelligent

activity even after death, and not being deprived of any natural power.............. 163 H. By the same, to the same. .................................................................................... 166 I. By the same, to Thallasius the presbyter and abbot. ............................... 167 J. By the same, to John the Cubicularius. ........................................................... 169 K. By the same, to an abbess, concerning a nun who left the monastery, and

repented. ...................................................................................................................... 170 (460) L. By the same, to John the Cubicularius, Concerning the correct dogmas of the

Church of God; and against Severus the heretic............................... 172 Exposition of the correct confession. .......................................................................................... 175 (569) Concerning difference; and how one must piously confess two natures in Christ after

the union............................................................................................................................. 176 Otherwise on the same things............................................................................................... 176 That number neither divides, nor is divided; nor does it introduce division according to its own

principle to the whole of which it is predicated. ..................................................................................... 178 How number is piously used for the demonstration of difference. .............. 179 How one must understand the saying which is found in the letter to Succensus of Saint

Cyril; and that the expression, 'In two,' does not conflict with those who say one incarnate nature of the Word; unless it is taken impiously according to the opinion of Nestorius. ......................... 180

That the difference in Christ is of things, that is, of substances, but not of qualities; and that every difference, of necessity, brings with itself the quantity of those things of which it is in every way said to be;

4

Εἰ ἀθάνατος ἡ ψυχή. ..................................................................................................... 137 Εἰ λογική ἡ ψυχή. .......................................................................................................... 138 Τί ψυχή. .......................................................................................................................... 138 Τί δέ νοῦς. ...................................................................................................................... 139 Τί φρένες. ....................................................................................................................... 139 Τί τρόπος. ....................................................................................................................... 139 Τί αἴσθησις. .................................................................................................................... 139 Τί πνεῦμα........................................................................................................................ 139

S.MAXIMI CONFESSORIS ΣΦΑΛΜΑ! ∆ΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΟΡΙΣΤΕΙ ΣΕΛΙ∆Ο∆ΕΙΚΤΗΣ.

EPISTOLAE .............................................ΣΦΑΛΜΑ! ∆ΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΟΡΙΣΤΕΙ ΣΕΛΙ∆Ο∆ΕΙΚΤΗΣ.

Α´. ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΑΡΑΙΝΕΤΙΚΟΣ Σελ. 364............................................................................ 139 Ἐν εἴδει ἐπιστολῆς ........................................................................................................ 139 Πρός τόν δοῦλον τοῦ θεοῦ κύριον Γεώργιον τόν πανεύφημον ἔπαρχον Ἀφρικῆς.

................................................................................................................................................. 139 ΣΧΟΛΙΑ. .......................................................................................................................... 149 Β´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός Ἰωάννην κουβικουλάριον, περί ἀγάπης.................................. 149 ΣΧΟΛΙΑ. .......................................................................................................................... 155 Γ´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός τόν αὐτόν...................................................................................... 155 (413) ∆´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός τόν αὐτόν, περί τῆς κατά Θεόν λύπης. ........................... 156 Ε´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός Κωνσταντῖνον.............................................................................. 159 στ´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός τόν ἁγιώτατον καί μακαριώτατον ἀρχιεπίσκοπον Ἰωάννην,

περί τοῦ , Ὅτι ἀσώματός ἐστιν ἡ ψυχή. ............................................................................ 160 Ζ´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός Ἰωάννην πρεσβύτερον, περί τοῦ καί μετά θάνατον ἔχειν τήν

ψυχήν τήν νοεράν ἐνέργειαν, καί μηδεμιᾶς ἐξίστασθαι φυσικῆς δυνάμεως.............. 163 Η´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός τόν αὐτόν. .................................................................................... 166 Θ´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός Θαλλάσιον πρεσβύτερον καί ἡγούμενον. ............................... 167 Ι´Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός Ἰωάννην κουβικουλάριον. ........................................................... 169 ΙΑ´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ πρός ἡγουμένην, περί ἀσκητρίας ἐξελθούσης τῆς μονῆς, καί

μετανοησάσης. ...................................................................................................................... 170 (460) ΙΒ´. Τοῦ αὐτοῦ, πρός Ἰωάννην κουβικουλάριον, Περί τῶν ὀρθῶν τῆς

Ἐκκλησίας τοῦ Θεοῦ δογμάτων· καί κατά Σευήρου τοῦ αἱρετικοῦ............................... 172 Ἔκθεσις ὀρθῆς ὁμολογίας. .......................................................................................... 175 (569) Περί διαφορᾶς· καί πῶς εὐσεβῶς δεῖ δύο φύσεις ὁμολογεῖν ἐπί Χριστοῦ μετά

τήν ἕνωσιν............................................................................................................................. 176 Ἑτέρως περί τῶν αὐτῶν............................................................................................... 176 Ὅτι ἀριθμός οὔτε διαιρεῖ, οὔτε διαιρεῖται· οὔτε διαίρεσιν εἰσάγει κατά τόν ἴδιον

λόγον τό σύνολον οἷς ἐπιλέγεται. ..................................................................................... 178 Πῶς εὐσεβῶς πρός δήλωσιν τῆς διαφορᾶς ὁ ἀριθμός παραλαμβάνεται. .............. 179 Πῶς χρή νοεῖν τήν κειμένην ῥῆσιν εἰς τήν πρός Σούκενσον ἐπιστολήν τοῦ ἁγίου

Κυρίλλου· καί ὅτι οὐ μάχεται ἡ, Ἐν δύο φωνή, τοῖς λέγουσι μίαν τοῦ Λόγου φύσιν σεσαρκωμένην· εἰ μή κατά Νεστορίῳ δοκοῦν ἀσεβῶς λαμβανομένη. ......................... 180

Ὅτι πραγμάτων ἤγουν οὐσιῶν ἐπί Χριστοῦ ἡ διαφορά, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ ποιοτήτων· καί ὅτι πᾶσα διαφορά, ἐξ ἀνάγκης ἑαυτῇ συνεισάγει τήν ὧν εἶναι λέγεται πάντως ποσότητα·