447

causing for themselves, both unwillingly and senselessly, through the inclination towards non-being, the privation of being.

10. But perhaps if one were to say that both the intelligible and the sensible creation hold to the Creator Logos through Moses and Elijah, he would not err from the truth. Of these, Moses represents the sensible creation, as one who came under generation and corruption, as the history concerning him shows, announcing his birth and death. For such is also the sensible creation, having a known beginning of generation (1165) and expecting a determined end of corruption. But Elijah represents the intelligible creation, in that the history concerning him reveals neither his birth, even if he was born, nor is his corruption through death decreed to be expected, even if he will die. For such is also the intelligible creation, having neither a beginning of generation manifest to men, even if it has come into being and has begun and has been brought from non-being into being, nor does it await a determined end of being through corruption. For it is naturally incorruptible, having received this from God, who willed to create it thus.

Another comprehensive contemplation on the Transfiguration. But if I do not seem to anyone to be more curious than is needful, another great and divine mystery, as

I think, appears to us from the divine Transfiguration, and more brilliant than what has been said. For I think that the God-befitting dramas on the mountain during the Transfiguration mystically suggest the two universal modes of theology: I mean the one that is primary, simple and uncaused, which through sole and complete negation truly affirms the divine and duly venerates Its transcendence through unspeakability; and the one that follows this and is composite, which through affirmation magnificently adumbrates it from its effects; to which modes, insofar as it is possible for men to know, the knowledge concerning God and divine things, which is suspended over us, leads us through symbols appropriate to us, setting the principles of both before us through a pious understanding of beings, teaching that everything beyond sense is a symbol of the former, and instructing that the magnificent works of the senses are aggregative of the latter. For from the symbols beyond sense we believe only that the truth beyond reason and mind exists, not at all daring to investigate or conceive what and how and of what sort it is, or where and when, avoiding the impiety of the attempt; but from those according to sense, as is possible for us, receiving only faintly by way of conception the likenesses of the knowledge of God, we say that He is all those things that we have come to know from His works, as their Cause.

That the Lord also became a type of Himself according to His economy in the flesh. But let us consider whether for each of the aforesaid modes, according to the divine

Transfiguration of the Lord the symbol is not present fittingly and wisely. For He, in appearance unchangeably created like us through immeasurable love for mankind,

deigned to become a type and symbol of Himself, and to reveal Himself symbolically from Himself, and through Himself who is manifest to guide the whole creation to Himself who is completely and invisibly hidden, and to the invisible and beyond-all secret mystery, which is in no way at all to be conceived by any of the beings, or

447

ἐαυτοῖς ἀβούλως τε καί ἀφρόνως διά τῆς πρός τό μή ὄν νεύσεως τοῦ εἶναι παρεχομενους τήν ἔλλειψιν.

Ι´. Ἴσως δέ καί τήν νοητήν καί τήν αἰσθητήν κτίσιν ἔχεσθαι τοῦ ∆ημιουργοῦ Λόγου τις εἰπών διά τοῦ Μωϋσέως καί Ἠλίου, τῆς ἀληθείας οὐ διαμαρτάνει. Ὧν τῆς μέν αἰσθητῆς Μωϋσῆς λόγον ἐπέχει, ὡς ὑπό γένεσιν καί φθοράν γενόμενος, καθώς ἡ περί αὐτοῦ ἱστορία δηλοῖ, τήν γένεσιν καί τόν θάνατον αὐτοῦ καταγγέλλουσα. Τοιοῦτον γάρ καί αἰσθητή κτίσις, ἀρχήν ἐγνωσμένην γενέσεως ἔχουσα (1165) καί διαφθορᾶς ὡρισμένον τέλος ἐλπίζουσα. Τῆς δέ νοητῆς Ἠλίας, ὡς οὔτε γένεσιν αὐτοῦ τῆς περί αὐτοῦ μηνυούσης ἱστορίας, κἄν εἰ γεγέννηται, οὔτε μήν τήν διά θανάτου φθοράν ἐλπίζεσθαι ὁριζομένης, κἄν εἰ τεθνήξεται. Τοιοῦτον γάρ καί ἡ νοητή κτίσις, οὔτε ἀρχήν γενέσεως ἀνθρώποις κατάδηλον ἔχουσα, κἄν εἰ γεγένηται καί ἦρκται καί ἐκ τοῦ μή ὄντος εἰς τό εἶναι παρῆκται, οὔτε τέλος τοῦ εἶναι διά φθορᾶς ὡρισμένον ἐκδέχεται. Τό γάρ ἀνώλεθρον φυσικῶς ἔχει λαβοῦσα παρά Θεοῦ, τοῦ οὕτως αὐτήν δημιουργῆσαι θελήσαντος.

Ἄλλη συνεκτική θεωρία εἰς τήν μεταμόρφωσιν. Εἰ δέ τῷ μή περιεργότερος τοῦ δέοντος εἶναι δοκῶ, καί ἕτερον μέγα τε καί θεῖον, ὡς

οἶμαι, ἐκ τῆς θείας μεταμορφώσεως μυστήριον ἡμῖν ἀναφαίνεται, καί τῶν εἰρημένων λαμπρότερον. Οἶμαι γάρ τούς καθόλου δύο τῆς θεολογίας τρόπους μυστικῶς ὑφηγεῖσθαι τά ἐπί τοῦ ὄρους κατά τήν μεταμόρφωσιν, θεοπρεπῆ δραματουργήματα, τόν τε προηγούμενόν φημι καί καί ἁπλοῦν καί ἀναίτιον, καί διά μόνης καί παντελοῦς ἀποφάσεως τό θεῖον ὡς ἀληθῶς καταφάσκοντα, καί τήν ὑπεροχήν αὐτοῦ δι᾿ ἀφασίας δεόντως σεμνύνοντα, καί τόν ἑπόμενον τούτῳ καί σύνθετον, διά καταφάσεως μεγαλοπρεπῶς ἐκ τῶν αἰτιατῶν ὑπογράφοντα· οἷς, κατά τό δυνατόν ἀνθρώπους εἰδέναι, ἡ περί Θεοῦ τε καί τῶν θείων ἐπαιωρουμένη γνῶσις διά τῶν προσφυῶν ἡμῖν συμβόλων πρός ἀμφοτέρους ἡμᾶς ἄγει τούς τρόπους, δι᾿ εὐσεβοῦς τῶν ὄντων κατανοήσεως ἀμφοτέρων ἡμῖν ἐφιστῶσα τούς λόγους, καί τοῦ μέν προτέρου πᾶν τό ὑπέρ αἴσθησιν σύμβολον εἶναι διδάσκουσα, τοῦ δέ δευτέρου τά κατ᾿ αἴσθησιν ἀθροιστικά εἶναι παιδεύοντα μεγαλουργήματα. Ἐκ γάρ τῶν ὑπέρ αἴσθησιν συμβόλων τήν ὑπέρ λόγον καί νοῦν ἀλήθειαν εἶναι μόνον πιστεύομεν, περί τοῦ τί καί πῶς καί ὁποίαν εἶναι καί ποῦ καί πότε μηδ᾿ ὅλως τολμῶντες σκοπεῖν ἤ ἐννοεῖν ἐνεχόμενοι, τῆς ἐγχειρήσεως τό ἀσεβές παραιτούμενοι· ἐκ δέ τῶν κατ᾿ αἴσθησιν, ὡς ἡμῖν ἐστι δυνατόν, κατ᾿ ἔννοιαν μόνον ἰσχνῶς τῆς περί Θεοῦ γνώσεως τάς εἰκασίας λαμβάνοντες πάντα αὐτόν εἶναί φαμεν ὅσα ἐκ τῶν αὐτοῦ ποιημάτων ὡς αἴτιον ἐγνωρίσαμεν.

Ὅτι καί ἑαυτοῦ τύπος ὁ Κύριος γέγονεν κατά τήν ἑαυτοῦ διά σαρκός οἰκονομίαν. Σκοπήσωμεν δέ εἰ μή καλῶς ἑκάστῳ τῶν εἰρημένων τρόπων κατά τήν θείαν

ἐκείνην τοῦ Κυρίου μεταμόρφωσιν καί σοφῶς ἐνυπάρχει τό σύμβολον. Εἴδει γάρ αὐτόν καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς ἀτρέπτως κτισθῆναι δι᾿ ἄμετρον φιλανθρωπίαν

καταδεξάμενον ἑαυτοῦ γενέσθαι τύπον καί σύμβολον, καί παραδεῖξαι ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ συμβολικῶς ἑαυτόν, καί δι᾿ ἑαυτοῦ φαινομένου πρός ἑαυτόν ἀφανῶς πάντη κρυπτόμενον χειραγωγῆσαι τήν ἅπασαν κτίσιν καί τῆς ἀφανοῦς καί πάντων ἐπέκεινα κρυφιομύστου καί ὑπ᾿ οὐδενός τῶν ὄντων οὐδενί τό σύνολον τρόπῳ νοηθῆναι ἤ